Answer:
The response that best illustrates the one-to-one principle is:
D. Simon, who says, "1, 2, C, D, F."
Explanation:
<u>The one-to-one principle focuses on the importance of attributing only one counting tag to each counted object. The counting tag can be a number, or a letter, for instance.</u> Simply put, the child should not repeat counting tags, such as in "2, 3, 3". They should be able to associate one counting tag to one of the objects. Also, <u>they need to be able to coordinate partitioning and tagging. That means the child must be able to differentiate the objects that have been counted from those that haven't.</u> Notice that, among the responses, <u>Simon</u> offered the one that showed this principle. He <u>was the only one who not only counted all the five objects in the array, but who also assigned only one tag to each object. The fact that he mixed numbers and letters does not affect this principle.</u>
Answer: The Ottoman Empire reached its peak between 1520 and 1566, during the reign of Suleiman the Magnificent. This period was marked by great power, stability and wealth
Explanation:
A noticeable difference between the traditional structures and the team structure is that under the traditional structure, it applies a power dynamic in which there is someone who will lead, and the others will follow, and also there are managers who will help in running things. While under the team structure, it employs power coming from the management to the employees.
Answer:
The correct answer is <u>behavioral perspective</u>.
Explanation:
The behavioral perspective explains that the behavior is influenced by the environment in which the person develops, it can be family, social, work, etc. Initially, this theoretical position was interested in observable behaviors, that is, the behaviors exhibited by people and those of those in their environment who accounted for them. Depending on the environment, man's behavior may be modified or affected according to the same and the environment to which they are exposed daily, to which they will respond in a positive or negative way seeking better performance or conversely disinterested in goals.
I believe the answer is: Ruling out rival hypotheses
Rival hypothesis refers to two possible alternatives to explain a certain occurrence which would contradict one another. Ruling out rival hypotheses is really crucial in order to improve internal validity of the result, and usually carried out by using control techniques (most important is random assignment).
