Term used for a situation in which paired-choice voting by majority rule fails to produce a consistent ranking of society's preferences for public goods is the paradox of voting.
The paradox of voting, also known as Downs' paradox, states that the costs of voting usually outweigh the expected benefits for a rational, self-interested voter. Because the likelihood of exercising the pivotal vote is negligible in comparison to any reasonable estimate of the private individual benefits of the various possible outcomes, the expected benefits of voting outweigh the costs.
Responses to the paradox of voting have included the belief that voters vote to express their preference for a candidate rather than to influence the outcome of the election, that voters exercise some altruism, or that the paradox ignores the collateral benefits associated with voting that are not related to the resulting electoral outcome.
Learn more about paradox of voting here:
brainly.com/question/17136492
#SPJ4
Answer:
difference threshold
Explanation:
Darrius is trying to play a trick on his housemate. He wants to add more weight to her backpack before she leaves for school, but he doesn't want her to notice it. He should determine the difference threshold so that he doesn't add enough for her to notice the additional weight.
Answer:
AbdiRahman Ali Tuur , hope it helps
This is the best I got: The best way to prove that slavery was in fact an inefficient market because the assumptions of Fogel and Engerman are weakly based and in some cases rather short-sighted.
Answer:
Half of
Explanation:
It has been established by a survey or research that about half of drivers who have given reports that while driving they fell asleep.
Sleeping while driving can be a major cause of accidents and a great risk to both the driver and other road users. It could be caused by lacking enough sleep, sleep disorders, medications.
