Answer:
B
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to pick from the options what should serve as the point of action of the firm given the scenario painted in the question;
We proceed as follows;
ATC= 30 $
Marginal revenue(MR)= 40 $
Price(P) =50 $
For efficiency,MC=minimum ATC=30 $
MR =40 > MC=30
For profit maximization, MR =MC
So, firm should raise output ,so that MR falls and becomes equal to MC
So correct option is B.
When a tax of $1.00 per gallon is imposed on sellers of gasoline, the supply curve for gasoline shifts upward, but by less than $1.00. A tax on sellers usually causes buyers to pay more for the good and sellers to receive less for the good than they did before the tax was levied.
Answer:
Why can't the Fed push the rate any lower than zero?
Real interest rates can be lower than zero, or negative (because inflation rate is higher than interest rate), but nominal interest rates are generally only limited to zero. But during this same time, the European Central Bank actually started paying negative interest rates on money deposits and many European private banks followed. That means that they charged people for having their money on the bank.
Why do you think that the Fed was so seemingly reluctant to push the rate all the way to the floor?
The reason why the Fed was not willing to push the interest rates to zero or even below zero was that by doing so, the US dollar would have depreciated or lost value. In Europe this was done to encourage people to spend their money and not save as much, but in the US that is not really a problem. Generally in the US the problem is that people spend too much and save too little, but on some European countries and Japan, people tend to save too much. For example in Japan the national savings rate fluctuates between 22-40%, while the maximum savings rate in the US has been 10.4% in 1960, it currently is around 7.6%.
A $2 bill is worth 200 pennies, 20 dimes, 4 half dollars, and 25 nickels.
Hope this helps :)
