The special program that they have conducted to the infants worked. The experiment was a success. And because of this, they could conduct more, special programs and even in a larger amount of infants they can conduct this. This special program is really beneficial to each and every one of them.
If management implements proper organization and <span>productivity will be higher,.
Proper organization refers to placing the Right people to do the right job, employee moral will make the employees have positive attachment to the company which will make them do their best to bring a good contribution for the company.</span>
Traditional career development programs of the past focused on helping an employee advance <span>by holding a series of jobs in a single organization.</span>
Answer:
To encourage someone to do something.
Explanation:
Incentives is defined as a thing that encourages someone to do something. One negative incentive is to charge a big fine on the motorists for the high speed in the school hours so that they obey the laws strictly while on the other hand, example of positive incentive is to give rewards or gifts or medals to those who obeys the law of speed limits in the school hours.
<span>Fair value is defined as, a rational and unbiased estimate of the potential market price of a good, service, or asset. It takes into account such objective factors as: acquisition/production/distribution costs, replacement costs, or costs of close substitutes.
Since this is an opinion question, either answering yes or no is correct, but you have to say why.
If I understand the question correctly, and the question isn't missing any parts, I would assume it's asking if you should put value on contracts as a document and other financial instruments.
I was going to say no, but because contracts can be transferred or used as currency, I would say yes.
If you say yes I would argue that giving a fair value of the contracts would make them more legal and have more bearing in a place of business. That it would prevent the fluctuation of value on that contract based on other factors like profit/loss and whether or not you transferred, changed, etc. the contract. I would argue that to protect that contract and other financial instruments, and the holders stake in it, you should create a fair value for it.
If you say no, I would argue that the contract can already be treated as a form of currency, and because of that it should not have a fair value placed on it. I would also argue that because contracts often times state the value of that contract within itself, that it should not have a fair value. And finally, I would argue that because with time, the value of items change, you should not place a fair value on a document that can be changed and can lose or gain value with time based on the purposed information in the contract.
</span>
