1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Inga [223]
2 years ago
13

Suppose that the calculated value of r between cognitive ability and job performance is 0.73. How much variation in job performa

nce is explained by the variation in cognitive ability?
Business
1 answer:
Inessa05 [86]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

53.28%

Explanation:

The correlation coefficient (r) between cognitive ability and job performance is provided as 0.73. Therefore, the coefficient of determination is calculated as follows:

Coefficient of determination = r² = 0.73² = 0.5329

Therefore, 53.28% can be concluded to be the variation in job performance as explained by the cognitive ability.

You might be interested in
George and Dan's political consulting firm is losing money, but it is more than covering its variable costs. What is the most ac
aniked [119]

Answer:

- It will go out of business in the long run.

Explanation:

If George and Dan's political consulting firm is losing money, but it is more than covering its variable costs, then the most accurate statement we can make about it is that: It will go out of business in the long run.

In the SHORT RUN, as long as the firm is covering variable costs, it means that the firm is able to generate normal profit or contribution that takes care of part or all of its fixed costs. It will stay in business

<u>In the LONG RUN, the firm will only continue to operate if it can make normal profits</u>

<u>Normal profit occurs when the difference between a company's total revenue and combined explicit and implicit costs are equal to zero.</u>

<u>Since George and Dan's political consulting firm cannot cover fixed costs, it will go out business in the long run.</u>

3 0
3 years ago
The Bogart Company produces 5,000 units of item SLM 46 annually at a total cost of $200,000
sertanlavr [38]

Answer:

Option B is the answer

Explanation:

Avoidable costs = 20,000+55,000+45,000 + (8*5000)+30,000

= 190,000

= 190,000/5,000 units

= $38 Option B is the answer

3 0
2 years ago
You interview with an athletic footwear manufacturer that has annual advertising expenditures of $32 million and total sales rev
son4ous [18]

Answer:

elastic.

Explanation:

The advertising elasticity of demand measures how sensitive a market and sales are to marketing expenses. Advertising elasticity is calculated by dividing the change in quantity demanded by the percentage change in advertising expenses. Generally products with low advertising elasticity tend to have elastic demands.

8 0
2 years ago
Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
Romashka [77]

Answer:

D. The threat of takeovers tends to reduce potential conflicts between stockholders and managers.

Explanation:

As with the threat of takeover, there comes the risk of losing control, power, monetary benefits, the stockholder's tend to agree with managers, and the manager's tend to agree with stockholders.

As both aims for no takeover of the company, both work in for each other, agreeing to the suggestions placed.

There is no dis-regard to any of the suggestions paid by any of the party. This threat actually creates moral harmony and unity among stakeholders and management.

Therefore, correct answer is:

D. The threat of takeovers tends to reduce potential conflicts between stockholders and managers.

8 0
3 years ago
The management of Kabanuck Corporation is considering dropping product V41B. Data from the company's accounting system appear be
Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

$191,500

Explanation:

If the item is not dropped:

Loss = Sales - Variable expenses - Fixed manufacturing expenses - Fixed selling and administrative expenses

       = $923,000 - $405,500 - $337,000 - $244,000

       = (63,500) loss

Fixed mfg. expenses remaining:

= Fixed manufacturing expenses - Avoidable Fixed manufacturing expenses

= $337,000 - $207,500

= $129,500

Fixed selling and administrative expenses remaining:

= Fixed selling and administrative expenses - Avoidable Fixed selling and administrative expenses

= $244,000 - $118,500

= $125,500

Loss in expenses remaining if item is dropped :

= Fixed mfg. expenses remaining + Fixed selling and administrative expenses remaining

= $129,500 + $125,500

= ($255,000)

Overall net operating income would decrease by:

= Loss in expenses remaining if item is dropped - Loss in expenses if item is not dropped

= $255,000 - $63,500

= $191,500

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which stage involves assigning meaning to events? Organization Selection Interpretation-Evaluation
    8·1 answer
  • Content theories attempt to explain work behaviors based on __________.
    8·1 answer
  • Orson takes harrison's car without harrison's permission and without just cause. orson has probably committed the tort of conver
    8·1 answer
  • Which negotiation approaches rainbow paints and xingpe are using?<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> .
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME ILL MAKE YOU BRAINLIEST
    12·1 answer
  • Suppose people expect inflation to equal 3 percent but in fact, prices have risen by 5%. Describe how this unexpectedly high inf
    9·1 answer
  • Over 50% of Americans have no long-term savings. Why do you think it's so
    15·1 answer
  • 5 strategies for keeping a job
    13·1 answer
  • ________ can be very useful in helping visualize where to make strategic changes to either move your product closer to the main
    15·1 answer
  • What is paulie's opportunity cost of producing one cup of ice cream (round to two decimal places)?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!