Answer:
the G20 aims to unite world leaders around shared economic, political and health challenges.
Explanation:
Brainliest Please Ty
Here's photos of the essay. I can't submit it here.
I've made a mistake above. It's 'use them to buys things to your heart's content'.
Answer:
U.S. Supreme Court case that successfully proved "lack of equality" in favor of a black applicant to the University of Texas Law School, beginning the process of ending the "separate but equal" doctrine of racial segregation established by the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson. The case was also influential in the landmark case of Brown vs. Board of Education four years later
Explanation:
Sweatt vs. Painter (1950) was a U.S Supreme court case that successfully challenge the separate but equal doctrine of racial segregation which was establish during the ruling of Plessy v. Ferguson case of 1896.In it ruling against Plessy v. Ferguson case a new verdict was made that the separate school established for blacks lacked substantive equality for a number of reason including the fact that the school had fewer faculty members and inferior law library and other facilities .The Court ruled Sweatt should be admitted to the Texas Law School because the law school for black students was not equal to the law school for white students.
Its claiming to be someone else in order to gain there money. its very illegal
Answer:
The given statement that Ethical relativism is the theory that, because different societies have different ethical beliefs, there is no rational way of determining whether an action is morally right or wrong other than by asking the people of that society what they believe is True.
Explanation:
The theory of 'Ethical relativism' states that what is morally correct or incorrect depends on the culture of the person. If the society around the individual thinks that particular action is morally right, then it is correct. In case the culture/society thinks the action is wrong, it is wrong.
What may be correct for one culture, may be incorrect or morally wrong for the other.
Its opposite is 'ethical objectivism' which means that although culture may be different, there are some moral principles which have universal validity.
