Answer: D. Maria would not have to pay anything
Explanation:
Maria would not have to pay anything because this does not fall under the terms of a QUASI CONTRACT as she did not gain unjustified enrichment.
In a QUASI contract, the main bone of contention is the ACCEPTANCE of a service but not the AGREEMENT of terms which can lead to unjust enrichment. In other words, if you ACCEPT a service but did not request it, you still have to pay.
Maria in this case neither requested NOR ACCEPTED the service and so she does not have to pay.
No picture and it wont let me copy and paste so try posting the picture again
An Ad populum mostly presumes that something must be true if most people believe it's true hasty generalization.
<h3>What is an Ad populum?</h3>
This refers to an argument based on the acceptance of an unproved conclusion by adducing irrelevant evidence based on the feelings, prejudices or beliefs of a large group of people.
In other word, it refers to the fallacious argument which is based on claiming a truth or affirming something is good because the majority thinks so.
Because of this, the Ad populum mostly presumes that something must be true if most people believe it's true hasty generalization.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about Ad populum
brainly.com/question/23714909
#SPJ1
Answer: His way of thinking closely resembles FUNCTIONALISM.
Explanation: Functionalism in Social science can be defined as the idea that social and cultural cohesion are a function of the interdependence and interactions of the institutions of a society.
This is essence what Pierre thinks about. Thinking of institutions and human activities ( social and cultural cohesion) by analysing relationship of each individual part as it relates to the whole (a function of the interdependence and interactions of the institutions of a society) .
Taking the pain of the abuse so that his core personality would survive.