Answer:
Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.
But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.
The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation
Answer:
For #5 all you have to do is set down to points in order for it to count. The answer is: (0,2) and (3,6)
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to find where exactly you must plot the points, we plug in what we know. In our equation, the 2 is our y intercept, this means that the point is (0,2) (Side Note: here's another example, (0,6) the 6 would be our y intercept)
From the point (0,2) we use the other value given. The other value given in this case, is our slope. When dealing with slope, we use Rise over Run or Rise/Run. This means that from the 2 on the graph, you rise 3 which would be 5 and you run to the right for 4. This now gets you the points (3,6)
Hope this helps with plotting the other questions! :)
(SIDE NOTE: IF THEY GIVE THE VALUE WITH X AS JUST A NUMBER, YOU CAN PLACE A 1 UNDER IT TO TURN IT INTO A FRACTION. FOR EXAMPLE 3X CAN BE TURNED INTO 3/1 WHICH WOULD THEN BE RISE 3 AND RUN 1.
(sooory about the caps, it's just to get your attention.)
