Answer:
b) Participants engaged in shallow processing without previous warning of a memory test.
Explanation:
First of all it is important that <u>the group has a warning</u> that there will be a memory test in order to perform better. So this will leave out options c) and d)
Second of all, it is important that the participants <u>are engaged in deep processing </u>which involves a deeper analysis of the situation, therefore, to perform well, people would need a deep processing.
Therefore, the group that would perform worst would be b) Participants engaged in <u>shallow processing</u> <u>without previous warning </u>of a memory test
The US Constitution is adaptable because the Founding Fathers deliberately made it relatively vague--meaning that they didn't get too specific because they knew it would have to endure in the future, when minds and society would be greatly different. It's also adaptable because it allows for amendments, which keep the document relevant with modern times.
To me that is pizza burgers and coke cola
13 regions the colonies broke into
Arguments that appear to be legitimate but are really founded on poor reasoning are known as logical fallacies. They could be the product of unintentional thinking mistakes or purposely employed to deceive others.
Taking logical fallacies at its value might cause to base our conclusions on weak arguments and result in poor decisions. Some of the text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies are :
- The Bandwagon Fallacy: Bandwagon fallacies, such as "three out of four individuals think X brand toothpaste cleans teeth best," are something that most of us expect to see in advertising; nonetheless, this fallacy may easily find its way into regular meetings and conversations.
- The Appeal to Authority Fallacy: Having an authoritative person support your claim might be a strong supplement to an existing argument, but it cannot be the main tenet of your case. Something is not always real just because a powerful person thinks it to be true.
- The False Dilemma Fallacy: The false dilemma fallacy claims that there are only two possible endings, which are mutually incompatible, rather than understanding that most (if not all) topics may be conceived of on a spectrum of options and perspectives.
- The Hasty Generalization Fallacy: This mistake happens when someone makes broad assumptions based on insufficient data. In other words, they ignore plausible counterarguments and make assumptions about the truth of a claim that has some, but insufficient, supporting evidence.
- The Slothful Induction Fallacy: This fallacy happens when there is enough logical evidence to conclude something is true, but someone refuses to admit it, instead attributing the result to coincidence or something completely unrelated.
- The Correlation Fallacy: If two things seem to be linked, it doesn't always follow that one of them caused the other indisputablelly. Even while it can seem like a straightforward fallacy to recognise, it can be difficult to do so in actual practise, especially if you truly want to uncover a link between two pieces of information to support your claim.
To learn more logical fallacies refer
brainly.com/question/18094137
#SPJ4
