The cold war was everything but a war in my opinion. It's was just Threats and a bunch of showing off. It's known as the 'Cold' war because it was a verbal war, and nothing physical, although it could have lead to the end of the world. The united states diplomatically isolated nations that maintain friendly relations with communist states, key word diplomatically, that means nonphysical resolution to conflict. I would go with the last option, it seems to fit best, the other three are absurd.
Hope I helped. :)
Countries on the coastline benefit the most by location because it's much easier to trade.
Answer:
The most effective responses will be those aimed at restoring harmony between supervisors, allowing all sectors to work efficiently. The least effective responses will be those that seek to help only one supervisor or just one, or some sectors, to the detriment of the others.
Explanation:
As we can see, Jamie is in a situation where his management is very important. This is because the sector of the 9 supervisors on the front line of a given service, are in conflict with each other, which ends up harming the company's success, since it is necessary that all sectors work together.
The meeting established by Jamie, has the responsibility to evaluate the arguments of the supervisors and choose those that will bring an effective result within the company. Jamie must choose as efficient the arguments that show cooperative forms among supervisors, which promote the good functioning of all sectors. However, he must consider as non-efficient, all those arguments that provide separatist ideas and that promote the growth of only some sectors to the detriment of others.
Answer:
Explanation:
The French and Indian War was the North American conflict in a larger imperial war between Great Britain and France known as the Seven Years’ War. The French and Indian War began in 1754 and ended with the Treaty of Paris in 1763. The war provided Great Britain enormous territorial gains in North America, but disputes over subsequent frontier policy and paying the war’s expenses led to colonial discontent, and ultimately to the American Revolution.
Map from the French and Indian War
The French and Indian War resulted from ongoing frontier tensions in North America as both French and British imperial officials and colonists sought to extend each country’s sphere of influence in frontier regions. In North America, the war pitted France, French colonists, and their Native allies against Great Britain, the Anglo-American colonists, and the Iroquois Confederacy, which controlled most of upstate New York and parts of northern Pennsylvania. In 1753, prior to the outbreak of hostilities, Great Britain controlled the 13 colonies up to the Appalachian Mountains, but beyond lay New France, a very large, sparsely settled colony that stretched from Louisiana through the Mississippi Valley and Great Lakes to Canada. (See Incidents Leading up to the French and Indian War and Albany Plan)
The border between French and British possessions was not well defined, and one disputed territory was the upper Ohio River valley. The French had constructed a number of forts in this region in an attempt to strengthen their claim on the territory. British colonial forces, led by Lieutenant Colonel George Washington, attempted to expel the French in 1754, but were outnumbered and defeated by the French. When news of Washington’s failure reached British Prime Minister Thomas Pelham-Holles, Duke of Newcastle, he called for a quick undeclared retaliatory strike. However, his adversaries in the Cabinet outmaneuvered him by making the plans public, thus alerting the French Government and escalating a distant frontier skirmish into a full-scale war.
<span>In the mayor council government, the city council is the legislative body, while the mayor is the city's chief executive officer. In this government they have a weak mayor plan, which limits the power of the mayor and gives more power to the city council, and the strong-mayor plan, which gives more power to the mayor and less to the city council. In this type of government city council members and mayors are usually elected. The council-manager government is a commission with a city manager. Voters elect a city council. The council then appoints a city manager. The city manager then appoints the heads of city departments. They are the same because in both they elect a city council.
</span>I hope this helps, if you have any questions about this, feel free to ask. If it is no trouble, would you also be so kind as to mark this response as the brainliest?
