At first, Christians were considered pagans and suferred persecutionwithin the Roman Empire, where they remained loyal to their politeistic cult. 
This was the situation until the arrival of Emperor Constantine the Great to power, who ruled between the years 306 and 337 AD. He was the first emperor that converted to the Christian faith, almost in his deathbed. However, he had previously influenced the enactment of the Edict of Milan in 313, that implemented religious tolerance and the end of persecutions of Christians within the borders of the Empire. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
I believe the answer is: 
women express their feelings verbally more than men do,  
while men tend to prefer to keep the emotions at bay or express it througb non-verbal actions.
women and men show only a few differences in sexual attitudes and behavior.
Generally, men and women enjoy sex equally. Few differences could be said on female mate selection that put status in society as a more crucial factors compared to men on average.
 there is very little difference in the way that men and women provide support.
Instinctually, humans would give words or encouragement or by intimate touch (hugs or kisses) to provide support. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:state 
Explanation:it is not important enough for federal 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Despite wide recognition that speculation is critical for successful science, philosophers have attended little to it. When they have, speculation has been characterized in narrowly epistemic terms: a hypothesis is speculative due to its (lack of) evidential support. These ‘evidence-first’ accounts provide little guidance for what makes speculation productive or egregious, nor how to foster the former while avoiding the latter. I examine how scientists discuss speculation and identify various functions speculations play. On this basis, I develop a ‘function-first’ account of speculation. This analysis grounds a richer discussion of when speculation is egregious and when it is productive, based in both fine-grained analysis of the speculation’s purpose, and what I call the ‘epistemic situation’ scientists face.