Sherif's work on the autokinetic effect primarily demonstrates the power of <u>conformity</u>, and Asch's studies on line judgments demonstrate the power of<u> independence</u>.
The autokinetic effect (also called autokinesis and autokinetic illusion) is a visual phenomenon in which small stationary spots of light appear to move in dark or featureless environments. In 1799 Alexander von Humboldt first recorded observing the phantom movement of stars in a dark sky, which he believed to be real.
It is believed to occur because the position of a single point is undefined, as it is always relative to a reference point and there is no reference point in dark or structureless environments. The direction of movement does not appear to be correlated with involuntary eye movements but is influenced by the error between the position of the eyeball and the position determined by the efferent copy of the movement signal sent to the extraocular muscles. You can decide.
Learn more about the Autokinetic Effect here : brainly.com/question/27494408
#SPJ4
A client who has a mental illness and was considered a threat to himself and others may have the right to self-determination withdrawn.
The care team is able to withdraw the client's rights of self-determination, justifying that due to their illness, their behavior and actions are harmful and therefore this person is not able to make their own decisions.
Therefore, this constitutes a legal and confidential act of benefit to the client with mental illness, which removes the client's right to reject the treatment offered by the care team.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/16770393
If i’m not mistaken, it would be C, chemical change.
The first group of around 200 arrived in 1765, led by Joseph Broussard (called "Beausoleil"). They settled chiefly in the southwestern Louisiana region now called Acadiana. The Acadian refugees were welcomed by the Spanish as additions of Catholic population. Their descendants came to be called Cajuns.
Answer: False
Explanation: Employment at will (EAW) is a term used in for contractual relationships between an employer and an employee in which an employee can be dismissed by an employer for any reason without warning, as long as the reason is not illegal.
Also, when an employee is acknowledged as being hired "at will," the courts deny the employee any claim for loss resulting from his/her dismissal.
In October 2000 the Supreme Court of California reaffirmed employers' rights under the at-will doctrine, explaining that an employer may terminate its employees at will, for any or no reason. The employer may act arbitrarily without providing specific protections such as prior warning, fair procedures or objective evaluation. The mere existence of an employment relationship affords no expectation by law, that employment will continue, or will end only on certain conditions, unless the parties have actually adopted such terms.