Based on the audio and other cues such as the age of the speaker, the activity that is not mentioned is that the speaker <u>Shaves</u>.
The audio talks about how the speaker:
- Brushed their teeth
- Got dressed for school
- Left for school
The audio made no mention of the speaker shaving in the morning which makes sense because the speaker sounded quite young.
In conclusion, the speaker did not shave in the morning.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/11847855. </em>
The last Erickson stages is called
Adulthood
Golden Years
Answer: b. paraphrasing.
Paraphrasing is a device where the same idea is expressed in different words, especially for the purposes of clarification.
In this case, Lance's response is an attempt to repeat the same idea Randy expressed, but in clearer words.
I think it could be C) raw materials
Answer:
The best answer to the question: In this scenario, Josh and Colin´s differing legal philosophies seem to adhere most closely to:___, would be, A: Natural law for Josh and Legal Positivism for Colin.
Explanation:
Josh and Colin have a very different approach to how they interpret the event that is taking place: Josh speeding above the limits imposed by the law. To Josh, natural law applies because to him no imposed law should limit his ability to race the car, and prevent him from using the full potential. There should be no limit unless it is his own limit, to what he can d, or not do. However, Colin wishes Josh to respect the law, not because its a law in itself, but because it is what is right and accepted by the society they live in. So he adheres to Legal Positivism which is basically referred to as adherence to the law not for its merit as a law, but rather because it is socially accepted and therefore has a backing system to it. This is why the answer is A.
