1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
oee [108]
3 years ago
7

Kant writes: "Let every one be as happy as heaven please or as he can make himself; I will take nothing from him nor even envy h

im, only I do not wish to contribute anything either to his welfare or to his assistance in distress!
Does Kant agree or disagree with this claim? Why?

A) He agrees with it. Everyone really needs to just help themselves.
B) He disagrees with it. It's better if everyone at least talks about sympathy and good will even if they cheat and betray the rights of man whenever they can
C) He disagrees with it. Anyone who willed that this be a universal law would find that by doing so they deny themselves the very help they will someday need
D) He agrees with it: the categorical imperative is not an excuse for excessive charity
Social Studies
1 answer:
Delicious77 [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

B) He disagrees with it. It's better if everyone at least talks about sympathy and good will even if they cheat and betray the rights of man whenever they can

Explanation:

He disagrees with this claim because he has heart broken due to cheated by his partner. Due to his heart broken he writes "Let every one be as happy as heaven please or as he can make himself; I will take nothing from him nor even envy him, only I do not wish to contribute anything either to his welfare or to his assistance in distress.'' In this statement he says that he wants that everyone has to be happy and enjoy their lives. He says that he has no feelings for him not even jealousy. He also says that he wanted not to take part in his development or bad conditions.

You might be interested in
Some types of requirements, although they favor one protected class of people over another, can be legally justified if they are
Volgvan

Some types of requirements, although they favor one protected class of people over another, can be legally justified if they are a <u>business necessity</u> to the job or work the employee will do.

<h3>What is a business necessity?</h3>

In the business sphere, the necessity refers to the legal concept used to justify an employer’s employment criteria that disproportionately affect a group of individuals. This justification resides in the possibility that a company has legitimate reasons to operate under such restrictive employment practices.

Because of this, a firm can favor one protected class of people over another, can be legally justified if they are a <u>business necessity</u> to the job or work the employee will do.

Read more about business necessity

brainly.com/question/12306736

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Nosotros _________ de california.
Dafna11 [192]
The correct answer is A. Somos

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Characteristics of an altered state of consciousness include:
34kurt

Answer: D

Explanation: The correct answer is letter D, all of the above.

A person who suffers from an altered state of conciousness, is probably going to experience hallucinations or perceptual distortions that also will cause him to change the meaning of new experiences. Depending on how the state of conciousness is altered (higher state of lower state), the person will experience different extremes of emotions, if its a lower state it will probably feel more depressed, whereas in higher states it will probably feel more maniac or exalted.

6 0
3 years ago
Jane has been clean and sober for three weeks. after a stressful week, she is overcome by the need to have a drink and ends up g
Maksim231197 [3]
The answer is a relapse. A relapse occurs when a person who has gone into recovery or has been sober for a long time goes back into abusing drugs and any addictive substances. This can also be seen in patients who had shown a period of health improvement goes back to deteriorating state.
3 0
4 years ago
Help, please anybody
77julia77 [94]

Answer:

The Chorus states that a conversation with Teiresias is “the next best” thing to being able to speak to the gods, and that “Our lord Teiresias can see into things, like lord Apollo” . Therefore, a prophet is someone who is closer to the gods than most humans, or someone who knows what the gods know.

Explanation:

pls make me braniest if I'm right

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Mexico has grains against its property problems by investing in what​
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement gives the correct meaning of the underlined sentence in this paragraph?
    13·1 answer
  • Erin has been living with her boyfriend for a year. During that time, Erin has heard her boyfriend and his family make many nega
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements regarding explicit memory is FALSE? Select one: a. Explicit memory is often tested by recall t
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is true? Federal agencies require institutions to have a conflict of conscience policy. Federa
    13·1 answer
  • Who did the Alien and Sedition Acts target? Check all that apply
    10·1 answer
  • Use the drop-down menus to complete the sentences. Subjects of the Ming dynasty grew because of weak rulers and corrupt or disho
    7·2 answers
  • !!! PLSSSSSS HELPPPPP !!!
    10·1 answer
  • Alexander the Great, hero or villain? in a 7 to 8 sentence's.
    13·1 answer
  • Which situation indicates the nurse needs additional training on effective delegation?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!