Yes because in the 1800's people still need to tranport themselfs to work or where they need to be and now we still do now
Answer:
Following are the solution to the given question:
Explanation:
In a mistaken declaration by a child of his age and depending on such misrepresentation, another party engages with a child in good faith. There is no unitary norm. States vary, but any of the above may be valid, based on the jurisdiction.
But you're not bound by the contract whether you have accepted and are under 18 (In the U.S.). If they are brought to court, they will win because a minor cannot agree under 18. Even when a minor is about maturity in the contract, a contract is void.
Is known as a peremptory challenge.
The balloon begins to loose pressure.
Is this a question or a comment?
