I believe the answer is <span>The country will have to import most of the products it needs. </span>
Answer: Curvilinear relationship
Explanation:
A curvilinear relationship could be defined as a relationship where two variables tend to increase at a particular period and after a while one of the variables keeps increasing while the other decreases. The people were enjoying the song being played in the radio but after a while they get tired of it, they have been too familiar with it they request the playing time be cut down, this is a Curvilinear relationship.
1. We can analyze the possible social benefits or consequences by creating a standard that deemed as 'desirable' social situation and measures the situation before and after the militarization.
If after the militarization our society got closer to the desirable outcome, we would say that the militarization produces a social benefit.
2. We could take a look at the example of American military occupation in Iraq.
Initially, we intended for the militarization to create a democratic country in iraq after we remove the dictator from power.
But it only resulted in a vacuum that attract many radical groups to came in to control the country. In this case, we can conclude that the militarization produce more consequences than benefit.
<span>The governor-general in both New Zealand and Australia do indeed have a lot of official authority. However, they are not the most powerful people in their respective countries. This is because the governor-general of Australia and New Zealand are representatives of the Monarchy. The current ruler of the monarchy is the Queen of England. They are directly responsible to the Queen. There are currently 6 governor-generals in Australia. The Prime Minister in Australia and New Zealand are considered the most powerful politicians. </span>