Answer:
0.0064 is your answer
Step-by-step explanation:
because 4÷25 = 0.16 and 4÷100=0.04 and of course 4÷4=1
When the 0.16 and 0.04 that gets 0.0064
Answer:
should be easy just plot the points
Step-by-step explanation:
we don't have the chart, though.
<span>Is the following definition of perpendicular reversible? If
yes, write it as a true biconditional.</span>
Two lines that intersect at right angles are perpendicular.
<span>A. The statement is not reversible. </span>
<span>B. Yes; if two lines intersect at right
angles, then they are perpendicular.
</span>
<span>C. Yes; if two lines are perpendicular, then they intersect at
right angles. </span>
<span>D. Yes; two lines
intersect at right angles if (and only if) they are perpendicular.</span>
Your Answer would be (D)
<span>Yes; two lines
intersect at right angles if (and only if) they are perpendicular.
</span><span>REF: 2-3 Biconditionals and Definitions</span>
Answer:
maybe?
Step-by-step explanation:
I am not sure
Answer:
The P value indicates that the probability of a linear correlation coefficient that is at least as extreme is 0.3% which is not significant (at α = 0.05), so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between weight and consumption. of highway fuel in cars.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have that the correlation coefficient shows the relationship between the weights and amounts of road fuel consumption of seven types of car, now the P value establishes the importance of this relationship. If the p-value is lower than a significance level (for example, 0.05), then the relationship is said to be significant, otherwise it would not be so, this case being 0.003 not significant.
The statement would be the following:
The P value indicates that the probability of a linear correlation coefficient that is at least as extreme is 0.3% which is not significant (at α = 0.05), so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between weight and consumption. of highway fuel in cars.
