Answer:
Identity versus role confusion
Intimacy versus isolation
Explanation:
Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development proposes that people pass through a series of stages centered on social and emotional development. At each point in a person’s life, he or she faces a developmental conflict that must be resolved. People who overcome these conflicts are able to achieve psychological skills that ultimately last the rest of a person’s life. Those who fail to master these challenges will continue to struggle.
The adolescent struggle to get an identify for themselves and be more certain about the role life would have them play while the young adult struggle with the need to create intimacy or end up being in isolation.
Answer:
B) False
Explanation:
They both do not believe that freewill is consistent with causal determinism.
Based on the triangular theory of love proposed by psychologist Robert Sternberg, Alix and James have an empty love type relationship.
According to the triangular theory there are three basic components that make up love relationships (intimacy, passion and commitment), as well as the possible combinations of these elements when forming the different types of relationships.
- Empty love is described as a high commitment in the relationship despite the ups and downs that may arise but without desire.
- Empty love is common in long-lasting relationships, where there is a sense of respect and reciprocity.
Therefore, we can conclude that in empty love according to the triangular theory there is the decision and the commitment to love the other but without desire.
Learn more about the triangular theory here: brainly.com/question/9803286
The Boston Port Act, the first of the laws passed in 1774 in response to the Boston Tea Party, closed the port of Boston until the colonists paid for the destroyed tea and until the king was satisfied that order had been restored. Colonists objected that the Port Act punished all of Boston rather than just the individuals who had destroyed the tea and that they were being punished without having been given an opportunity to testify in their own defense.
The Massachusetts Government Act provoked, even more, outrage than the Port Act because it unilaterally took away Massachusetts' charter and brought it under control of the British government. Under the terms of the Government Act, almost all positions in the colonial government were to be appointed by the governor, Parliament, or king. The act also severely limited the activities of town meetings in Massachusetts to one meeting a year, unless the Governor called for one. Colonists outside Massachusetts feared that their governments could now also be changed by the legislative fiat of Parliament.
The Administration of Justice Act allowed the Royal governor to order that trials of accused royal officials take place in Great Britain or elsewhere within the Empire if he decided that the defendant could not get a fair trial in Massachusetts. Although the act stipulated for witnesses to be reimbursed after having traveled at their own expense across the Atlantic, it was not stipulated that this would include reimbursement for lost earnings during the period for which they would be unable to work, leaving few with the ability to testify. George Washington called this the "Murder Act" because he believed that it allowed British officials to harass Americans and then escape justice. Many colonists believed the act was unnecessary because British soldiers had been given a fair trial following the Boston Massacre in 1770.
