Answer: when parties agree to an accord or satisfaction, the original obligation will be discharged immediately. Therefore the answer is TRUE
Explanation:
An accord and satisfaction is a legal contract whereby two or more parties which has been bond with a former agreement, agrees to discharge a tort claim, contract, or other liability that is bond to their former agreement, for an amount based on terms that differ from the original amount of the contract or claim. Accord and satisfaction helps parties in agreement to adjust it's former agreement, so as to get optimum satisfaction. This can also help them to settle legal claims instead of going to court.
When the two or more parties agreed to an accord and satisfaction, any formers agreement will be discharged, as the accord stands to be the new agreement for the party, and this agreement is been applied immediately, thereby discharging the former agreement immediately.
The fertile land in Egypt is along the Nile River, called the Nile Valley and the Nile Delta. When the Nile flooded each year, it deposited fertile muds in the valley and delta. The mud was rich and fertile and used to grow wheat and raise cattle. Farming methods included digging irrigation channels from the Nile River and using animal power to raise the irrigated waters.
False pretense must be interpreted by the courts and some circumstances automatically qualify as a false pretense, such as bigamy, when one of the parties is married already. This breaks the marriage contract and qualifies for a voiding of the marriage. Claiming to be 'with child', is a false pretense if a child is not born within 10 months of marriage. Impotence may qualify for a false pretense ruling under certain circumstances. If the courts decide your marriage should never have taken place then you make seek an annulment. The best advice is to visit a lawyer.
Answer:
RETROACTIVE INTERFERENCE
Explanation:
There are two kinds of retroactive interference. Proactive and retroactive. Janice falls under the proactive category. Proactive interference suggests that previously learned skill affects a new skill. Having learned French in the morning, she could not effectively articulate the Spanish that was learned in the afternoon.
