Answer:
No, there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the bags are underfilled
Step-by-step explanation:
A manufacturer of potato chips would like to know whether its bag filling machine works correctly at the 434 gram setting.
This means that the null hypothesis is:
It is believed that the machine is underfilling the bags.
This means that the alternate hypothesis is:
The test statistic is:
In which X is the sample mean, 
is the value tested at the null hypothesis, 
is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.
434 is tested at the null hypothesis:
This means that 
A 9 bag sample had a mean of 431 grams with a variance of 144.
This means that 
Value of the test-statistic:
P-value of the test:
The pvalue of the test is the pvalue of z = -0.75, which is 0.2266
0.2266 > 0.01, which means that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the bags are underfilled.
Answer:
3 + 1(3) +3 (the dollar amounts)
3+3+3
9
0.5 + 0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.5 (the cents)
1.3
9 +1.3 = 10.30 worth of groceries using front end estimation
Answer:
H0: p = 0.078
Ha: p ≠ 0.078
Step-by-step explanation:
The researchers say that the rate is about 7.8%, or 0.078 as a decimal. That makes that the null hypothesis because using "is" in math is the same as saying "equals" and the null hypothesis always has the statement of equality in it. The reason there is a not equals to sign in the alternate is for this reason as well. The researchers say it is about that amount, not more or less than that amount. So it makes this a 2 tailed test. If the amount is significantly higher or lower, then we might have to reject the null hypothesis depending on the outcome of the test.
Answer:
-4
Step-by-step explanation:
8-10 = -2
-2^2 = -4
