In geometry, the length of JK in terms of a, b, and x will be D. abx
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
It should be noted that from the information given, it was stated that in circle M, EMF measures the radians allocated, the length of radius FM is and the length of EF is x.
In the other circle, JNK also measures the radians allocated and the length of radius KN is b.
Therefore, the length of JK in terms of a, b, and x will be:
= a × b × x
= abx
Learn more about geometry on:
brainly.com/question/24375372
#SPJ1
Pretty sure that would be 120. Since the angles of a triangle add up to 180, you just add 25 and 35 (makes 60) and subtract it by 180, leaving 120
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
In retail grocery stores in the US, you can find ice cream packaged in sizes of 1 cup (half pint), 1 pint, 1 quart, 1/2 gallon, 1 gallon, and perhaps some odd sizes in between. For commercial purposes, ice cream may be packaged in tubs of 3- or 5-gallons or more.
1 teaspoon would be an unusually small size, and 1 mL is about 1/5 of a teaspoon. These quantities are somewhat smaller than would be considered a "serving" of ice cream, so would generally be of little practical use.
Answer:
What do Americans think about preferential hiring of women? Has there been a change in the past decade? In 2000(group 1) and 2010(Group 2), the General Social Survey asked participants if they would favor or oppose preferential hiring of women. In 2000, out of 849 respondents, 271 said yes. In 2010, out of 696 respondents, 225 said yes. The 95% confidence interval for p1-p2 is (-0.0509, 0.04273). What would be an appropriate conclusion? O We are 95% confident that the population proportion in 2010 that supported preferential hiring of women is about 0.0509 and the population proportion in 2000 is 0.04723. We are 95% confident that the pulation proportion in 2000 that supported preferential hiring of women is about 0.0509 and the population proportion in 2010 is 0.04723. We are 95% confidence that the population proportion in 2010 that supported preferential hiring of women is between 0.0509 less to 0.04273 more than the population proportion in 2000. O We are 95% confidence that the population proportion in 2000 that supported preferential hiring of women is between 0.0509 less to 0.04273 more than the population proportion in 2010.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
32h^7
Step-by-step explanation:
