Answer:
<em>Adult Acts:</em>
<em>Adults are prosecuted for “committing crimes”. </em>
<em>Juvenile Acts:</em>
<em>juveniles are prosecuted for committing “delinquent acts.” Many states classify juvenile offenders as those who are between the ages of ten and eighteen. In other words, anyone under eighteen is a juvenile, but you must be at least ten years of age to enter into the juvenile justice system. In other states, however, the age at which an offender is treated as an adult may be as young as sixteen or seventeen</em>
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
White collar crime refers to the crimes that are committed by business men and government employees whereas cyber crimes are committed by hackers, terrorists and others to invade the host computer and network system to derive the information.
The purpose of white collar crime is to not to defame somebody but some cyber crimes exhibit a motive to intentionally harm the reputation of the victim.
The white collar crime can be detected in terms of examination of financial accounting analysis and sale and purchase of goods and services but cyber crime remains undetected due to use of unknown devices to commit the offences the IP address and other required identification proofs cannot be found.
Money laundering and ponzi schemes are the examples of the white collar crimes and hacking, email spoofing are the examples of cyber crime.
Answer:
Elections centered on candidates and not on political parties have characteristics that make them particular and give them their own imprint. Thus, these elections are based not on general political platforms but on particular ideologies, which develop personalisms and political positions that are dangerous at times, given that they do not have the support (or responsibility) of organized groups such as political parties behind them.
In other cases, these types of elections have political parties actively participating and supporting each of the candidates, as was the case in the 2016 elections in the United States between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, but even so, the candidates end having a greater predominance than that of the political parties.
Answer:
The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.
Explanation:
The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers. This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions. The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage. With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.
Answer:
Fifth
Explanation:
That's called double jeopardy, which is explained in the 5th amendment.
