This reflects personal fable. This is an acceptance apprehended
by many youths telling them that they are different and exceptional, so much so
that nothing of life's problems or difficulties will touch them notwithstanding
of their behavior. This in turn can make them feel protected.
<span> </span>
Answer:
emotional
Explanation:
Stress: In psychology, the term "stress" is described as an individual's feeling of physical or emotional tension. Therefore, stress can come from any thought or event that can make an individual feel nervous, frustrated, or angry. Significantly, stress is considered as an individual's bodily reaction towards a specific demand or challenge. However, stress can be "positive" as well, for example, when it helps a person to avoid danger.
Signs: Headaches, problem sleeping, dizziness, etc.
In the question above, the given statement represents the "emotional" component.
I believe the answer is: Script
In psychology, script would determine the set of behaviours that a person tend to do when facing a certain situation. The formation of script usually influenced by several factors, including knowledge, previous experience, relationship with other people, or even personalities.
Answer:
Following are the solution to the given question:
Explanation:
In a mistaken declaration by a child of his age and depending on such misrepresentation, another party engages with a child in good faith. There is no unitary norm. States vary, but any of the above may be valid, based on the jurisdiction.
But you're not bound by the contract whether you have accepted and are under 18 (In the U.S.). If they are brought to court, they will win because a minor cannot agree under 18. Even when a minor is about maturity in the contract, a contract is void.
Answer: Stanley Milgram
Explanation: As Stanley Milgram himself stated, the essence of obedience to authority is when a person begins to perceive himself as a tool to fulfil the wishes of the authority, not his own wishes, so he sees all his actions and consequences of these actions as a result of the action of authority, not as a result of his will and responsibility. Milgram based his experiment on the conflict that arises between the state of obedience and the conscience of a person who subordinated to authority. The essence of the experiment concerned the responsibility of those who committed genocide during WWII, who claimed to have been merely obedient, i.e executing the orders of superiors, and based their defense on this claim.
This begs the question of whether or not they were complicit in the genocide.
The experiment was performed with pairs of participants where one was a "student" and the other was a "teacher", and where the student was connected to an electroshock electrode. Each time a student would give a wrong answer, the teacher would activate electricity through the electrodes and the student would experience an electric shock. With each wrong answer, the teacher would increase the level of electric shock. There are also some moderation in the experiment, such as a student would make a mistake on purpose, etc.
The conclusion is that ordinary people are generally willing to kill people, even if they are innocent in order to execute the orders of superiors, recognised as authority. It is considered that when it comes to authority, all its orders are justified and legal. So it is moral and proper to follow the orders of authority, whatever it may be.
