Answer: true
Explanation: One factor that seems to cause baby boomers to hark back to the Carter administration is high gasoline prices. When people think of Carter-era inflation, they often connect it to those high prices and the high world price of oil starting in 1973 and increasing, with fits and starts, through the 1970s. But one increased price does not inflation make. We can’t tell anything about inflation by looking at specific prices.
It is true that when a country such as the United States is a net importer of oil, an increase in the price of oil will, all else equal, cause our real GDP to be lower than otherwise. Go back to the equation of exchange discussed earlier. With slightly lower real GDP than otherwise, the price level, and therefore inflation, is higher than otherwise. But today the United States is only a small net importer of oil and as recently as late 2019 was a slight net exporter. So an increase in the price oil simply helps domestic producers to about the same extent that it hurts domestic consumers. The net effect on real US GDP is close to zero.
There’s one caveat to the above. Any government policy that causes waste makes real GDP lower than otherwise and, therefore, causes the price level to be somewhat higher than otherwise. The wasteful policy that is one of the factors in the recent increase in gasoline prices is the federal government’s policy on ethanol, which began during the George W. Bush administration. Although I can’t go into a detailed explanation here, the federal government’s requirement that refiners use ethanol in gasoline adds 30 cents to the price per gallon. Not all of that 30 cents was added recently. But the recently increased price of waivers that allow refiners to avoid using car-destroying ethanol has accounted for some of the recent increase in gasoline prices.
The answer is<u> "reference".</u>
The Semantic Triangle demonstrates the immediate connection between Words and Thoughts and Thoughts and Thing. Yet, the specked lines speak to the word (sign) isn't the Thing (a referent) and there is no any immediate connection among words and thing. The referent needs some related knowledge and reference about the word or sign to be complete.
The word implies diverse things to various individuals in various circumstances. Any sign or word which has its own particular significance is gotten a handle on with specific references to it. The way toward getting a handle on or understanding words or signs, which as of now have importance, with the affirmed implications given by the references is known as the significance of importance.
D. Symbolic
interactionist
<span>
In the context of symbolic interactionism,
it the study of human conduct and human life. How one’s social life is formed
and is being described by one’s perspective of self and others –community,
society and etc. In this approach, these 3 views were asserted by Herbert
Blumer (1969) as follows:</span>
<span><span>1.
</span>People
act on a specific object based on how they see or construe it according to
their outlook and attribution on the object.</span>
<span><span>
2.
</span>These
certain outlooks and attribution that has been formed by an individual is
shaped and reinforced by the people this individual is exposed to.</span>
<span><span>
3.
</span>These
outlooks and attribution are continuously changed and altered based on one’s
social environment. </span>
So it’s fair and no one holds too much power to change it
Answer: Affiliation
Explanation:
According to the theory of McClelland, need of affiliation is defined as the realization felt by a person to be involved in his/her social group . Sense of belongingness in felt in the form of requirement.
Affiliation displays the emotion of a person to be attacked and liked by members of the group and maintaining connection with them.Need of affiliation is important for building link as well as strength to cope with others.
