Answer:
It will overpopulate and harm
Explanation: without a predator the frog will most likely hurt the native animals and plants which isn’t good for the environment.
Answer:
Explanation:
One glycerol molecule and at least one fatty acid, with a maximum of three fatty acids. Glycerol is a sugar alcohol with three OH groups.
Microorganisms in their digestive tracts hydrolyze the cellulose to individual glucose units.
Cellulose- The stable formation of plant cell walls is greatly aided by cellulose, a hard, fibrous, and water-insoluble polysaccharide. The fibrils (bundles of microfibrils) and microfibrils (bundles of polysaccharide) made up of cellulose chains make up the plant cell wall.
Glucose- The primary form of sugar in the blood, glucose serves as the body's cells' principal source of energy. Glucose may be produced by the body from other chemicals or it can be obtained from the meals we eat. The circulation carries glucose to the cells. Insulin is one of many hormones that regulate blood glucose levels.
To know more about the digestion, click on the below link,
brainly.com/question/1283194
#SPJ4
Answer:
Suppose an abundance of hunting decreases the number of foxes in the ecosystem. Which of the following is the most likely impact of this decline in the fox population?
Once there is abundance decrease in hunting number of foxes in the ecosystem, there would be an increase in the population of foxes as a result of increase in birth rate and no death rate recorded, once there is unavailability in either predator and prey relationship it would benefit one, just as in the case of foxes mentioned above, since there is decrease in hunting number, hence; increases in number of foxes population
Explanation:
I believe it is A because Living things respond to changes, each and every living organism is made up of cell and adapting to changes is same as responding to changes.So, only one left is A.
