Answer:
Sir you need to put more Explannation in it because i cant figure it out properly
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: There is convincing evidence at the the significance level that the DMV's claim is incorrect.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since we have given that
Hypothesis:

Probability of teens pass their drivers test on the first attempt = 60% = 0.60
Number of teens = 125
Number of them passed the tests on their first try = 86

So, the value of test statistic would be

At α = 0.05% level of significance, critical value = 1.645
Since 1.645 < 2.01
So, we will reject the null hypothesis.
Hence, there is convincing evidence at the the significance level that the DMV's claim is incorrect.
The fluid ounce of vanilla is bigger.
3.angleB is congruent to angle F
4. The slope is -3 and the yintercept is 4