The relationship between city planning and obesity in Broderick's speech is B. The dramatic increase in obesity in the community has been caused by poor city planning.
<h3>What is obesity?</h3>
It should be noted that obesity is a complex disease that has to do with excess body fat.
In this case, relationship between city planning and obesity in Broderick's speech is the dramatic increase in obesity in the community has been caused by poor city planning.
Learn more about obesity on:
brainly.com/question/6493254
Judge Jones is using legal realism school of jurisprudence.
The philosophical school, historical school, realist school, sociological school, and analytical school are the five schools of jurisprudence.
Legal realism is a theory according to which public policy and prevailing social interests are the sources of all law. In accordance with this view, judges decide cases by taking into account social concerns and public policy in addition to abstract norms.
Legal realism is a kind of jurisprudence that places more emphasis on the law's application in daily life than it does in books. To this purpose, it focused primarily on the acts of judges and the variables that affected judicial decision-making processes.
To learn more about legal realism here
brainly.com/question/14482497
#SPJ4
Answer: ICS-202: Incident Objectives
Explanation:
The ICS-202 is stand for the incident objective which basically describe about the various types of incident objective, safety considerations and the incident strategy in the operational period.
The ICS is one of the type of communication tool that are used for control and also coordinate the given response and also providing the specific goal for stabilizing the environment.
The main purpose of implementing this incident objective is to meet the specific requirement of the resources by recommending the tactics.
Therefore, ICS-202: Incident Objectives is the correct answer.
<span>To divide we the people to weaken us, set us against each other with blame games and propaganda. Party loyalty blinders keep us from watching too closely what our own party representatives are doing against our own interests.
Like professional wrestlers they appear to be bitter rivals in public but are the best of friends behind closed doors. They have led us to think that only someone from their parties can win an election. If we vote for a third party candidate we have "thrown our vote away" on someone who stands no chance of winning and let that "evil other party" candidate win. We feel compelled to vote for the "lesser" of the two evils being offered.
Consider this: Both parties of the Senate said that the TARP bill lacked oversight to protect the taxpayer's money (concerning the original 3 page one passed by the House of Representatives). They claimed they were going to add protection and oversight to it. Then behind closed doors they added 137 pages of earmark spending and NO oversight or protection. Bush signed it and they closed the 110 Session of Congress knowing that they had an automatic pay raise in place. Both parties were involved so no evil other party blame games could be played.
Instead they faked outrage when the AIG bonus news came out and blamed the Management for not following rules which they had failed to put into the TARP bill in the first place. Watch this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu...</span>
