Answer:
The target stock price in one year is $264.75
Explanation:
We first calculate the ROE as below
ROE= Earnings / Book value of Equity
ROE= $948,600 / $6,200,000
ROE= 0.153
The payout ratio is:
b= Dividend / Net income
b = $493,272 / $948,600
b = 0.52
So the sustainable growth rate is:
g = ROE * (1-b)
g = 0.153 * (1-0.52)
g = 0.153 * 0.48
g = 0.07344
The earning in the first year are
EPS1 = $948,600 / 100,000 * (1 + 0.07344)
EPS1 = $9.486 * 1.07344
EPS1 = $10.1827
According to the benchmark PE ratio, the target stock price in one year is
Price = EPS1 * 26
Price = $10.1827 * 26
Price = $264.75
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in a microsoft excel document.
Explanation
Please consider the data provided by the exercise. If you have any question please write me back. All the exercises are solved in a single sheet with the formulas indications.
Answer:
b. Credit to Fair value adjustment for $5,000
Explanation:
Particulars Amount
Beginning balance of fair value adjustment $20,000
Less: Unrealized gain on Dec 31, year 3 <u>$15,000</u> ($515,000-$500,000)
Credit to Fair value adjustment <u>$5,000</u>
So, Credit to Fair value adjustment for $5,000 will be included in the related journal entry dated December 31, Year 3.
The effect of the transaction by Atkins Company of collecting payment for an amount owed by a customer is One asset would increase $1,750 and a different asset would decrease $1,750, causing no effect.
<h3>How does an increase and decrease in assets affect the accounting equation?</h3>
The fact that a customer owed Atkins Company means that the customer was an accounts receivable which is an asset account.
The cash that Atkins Company collected is also an asset. So, the transaction simply led to one asset(accounts receivable) being reduced and the other asset(cash) being increased. The amount is the same so there would be no effect.
Find out more on changes to the accounting equation at brainly.com/question/27905497
#SPJ1
Answer:
If an economist argues that everyone gains from trade, the following reasoning is most likely underlying her argument:
- Production according to the principle of comparative advantage lowers overall costs and therefore allows both countries to have a higher standard of living.
Explanation:
- The comparative advantage refer to the situation in which an individual, company or a country offers its services and products at a lower rate as compared to its competitor. This leads to trade-off as you have to comprise for the gain of something.
- This comparative advantage also increase the dependencies of nations or companies on each other.
- For example, England and Portugal has benefited from this comparative advantage concept as England get the wine at lower cost from Portugal and Portugal also get earning by selling this wine to England.
