Answer and Explanation:
The calculation of the adjusted price that could use for these two comps in a CMA is given below:
For Comp property A, the value of the garage should be
= $452,500 + $4,500
= $457,000
And, for comp property B, the value of the pool should be
= $446,000 + $5,000
= $451,000
In this way, it should be considered
Answer:
subsititution
Explanation:
Since in the situation it is mentioned that margot has fallen with 3 set bedroom i.e. 2500 square foot and its amount is $400,000. Now there is another three set bedroom of 2,400 square foot and its amount is $350,000 so here two options are given and according to the price he opted for the second property
So out of two choices he should opt for one that means it is a subsititution economic principle
In the past, the policy-making relationship between states and the federal government was called Dual federalism, since there was a clear separation of policy responsibility between the two levels.
Dual federalism, also known as hierarchical federalism or shared sovereignty, is a political arrangement in which powers are clearly divided between federal and state governments, with state governments exercising delegated powers without federal interference. .
Even the House and Senate are examples of dual federalism. Both houses may be involved in approving federal laws that affect different states and require state involvement, but issues can only be passed through the senator's desk or state senators. representative.
Learn more about Dual federalism here: brainly.com/question/5544302
#SPJ4
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
As we know that
1. Return on assets is
= Net income ÷ avg total assets
where,
Avg total assets is
= (opening total assets + closing total assets) ÷ 2
= ($6,806.4 + $6,899.2) ÷ 2
= $6,852.8
Now return on asset is
= $481.6 ÷ $6,852.8
= 7.0%
2. Assets turnover ratio = net sales ÷ avg total assets
= $17,371.2 ÷ $6,852.8
= 2.5 times
3. Profit margin = net income ÷net sales
= $481.6 ÷ $17,371.2
= 2.8%
Answer:
Explanation:
Given
Probability of a person to not enter into a bar or ducking is 
Probability of a person to enter into a bar
(Probability of a person to not enter into a bar or ducking)
Substituting the given value, we get
Probability of a person to enter into a bar
Total three men attempts to enter into the bar and their course of action is independent of each others
Thus, probability of observing the first two walking into the bar and the third ducking will be equal to the product of individual probabilities
