1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yuradex [85]
3 years ago
6

Why might Razis method not be a good way to estimate the probability? My team won 18 of their last 20 matches, so the probabilit

y that they will win their next match is 18/20 = 90%
Mathematics
1 answer:
FrozenT [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

It is a really idealistic way to estimate probability.

It usually works well for random events where there is no restriction like:

"There are N elements in a set, the probability of randomly selecting any element is the same (so there is no restriction) meaning that for every single element, the probability is 1/N.

Now suppose that there are K elements (K < N) with a given characteristic, then the probability of randomly selecting one of the K elements out of the sett with N elements is equal to K times the probability of each element, this is:

P = K*(1/N) = K/N"

Then if a dice has 6 possible outputs, and we want to find the probability of getting a 3 or a 5, we need to find the quotient between the outcomes where we get a 3 or a 5 (2) and the total number of outcomes (6)

P = 2/6

Now let's go to the case in the problem:

We know that out of the last 20 games, your team won 18.

Then yes, your team won (18/20)*100% = 90% of their played games.

Does this mean tath the probability of winning the next game is 90%?

Well no, because this is not a random selection, there are a lot of other things needed to analyze, as the win rate of the other team (suppose that the other team won 14 of their last 20 games, then their win rate is (16/20)*100% = 70%

Does this mean that the probability where our team wins is 90%, and the probability of the enemy team winning is 70%?

Well no, this makes no sense at all, and this is why this method is not a good way to estimate probability in complex cases like this one.

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP IM FAILING THIS CLASS
BaLLatris [955]

Answer:Y=3x+7.25

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Solve equation<br>8-3(p-4)=2p
LenKa [72]

Answer:

ok the answer is: p=-4

Step-by-step explanation:

First you distribute 3 times p-4 and get  8-3p+12=2p then you add 12 plus 8 and get 20 then you have 20-3p=2p you have to add 3p on both sides and you get 20= -5p you divide and get p= -4

6 0
3 years ago
Help!! Willmark brainliest!Can you guys please answer these 2 questions???
Leno4ka [110]

Answer:

1. A, 2 meters per second

2. F, 15

6 0
3 years ago
(X-3)^2=3 rational or irrational
const2013 [10]
I think it is irrational
7 0
3 years ago
F. describe the relationship between
Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

describe the relationship between what

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which expression is equivalent to 7.2 x 7.2 x 7.2 ?
    11·1 answer
  • What is the domain of f(x)=3x/x-1?
    7·2 answers
  • Triangle LMN is similar PQR. Which of the following proportions is NOT true?
    14·1 answer
  • Use the given property to complete the statement
    7·1 answer
  • Someone please help
    11·1 answer
  • What is the value of x?
    15·1 answer
  • you have an intial amount of $45 in a savings account and you deposit an equal amount into the account each week. After 5 weeks
    5·1 answer
  • In a DC circuit, the product of volts times the amperes is called?
    15·2 answers
  • Help I’m doing a test !!!!!
    6·2 answers
  • Factor this polynomial completely.<br> x2 - 81
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!