1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nignag [31]
3 years ago
8

Please help me: Questions are represented on photo above

Mathematics
1 answer:
Kitty [74]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

d ≥ 500

y ≥ 55

Step-by-step explanation:

at least & not less than indicate greater than or equal to (≥); therefore, simply use the variable, the ≥ sign, and the number to write out the inequality

You might be interested in
The diagram represents the truth values of the statements p and q.
Ira Lisetskai [31]
From the given figure, the statement that is true is "<span>The truth value of p ↔ q is 46".

</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Data from an independent research company found that the annual cost per worker for insurance​ (health, life,​ liability, etc.)
lesantik [10]

Answer:

The cost per worker goes in five years from $67.81 at 1997, to $394.14 in 2001. It is an increase of $326.33 (481%).

f(0)=67.81e^{0.44\cdot 0}=67.81*1=67.81\\\\f(1)=67.81e^{0.44\cdot1}=67.81*1.553=105.29\\\\f(2)=67.81e^{0.44\cdot2}=67.81*2.411=163.48\\\\f(3)=67.81e^{0.44\cdot3}=67.81*3.743=253.84\\\\f(4)=67.81e^{0.44\cdot4}=67.81*5.812=394.14\\\\

Step-by-step explanation:

The annual cost per worker is modeled by the function:

f(x)=67.81e^{0.44\cdot x}

where x = years from 1997.

We have to calculate the cost per worker from 1997 to 2001, according to the function f(x).

We have:

f(0)=67.81e^{0.44\cdot 0}=67.81*1=67.81\\\\f(1)=67.81e^{0.44\cdot1}=67.81*1.553=105.29\\\\f(2)=67.81e^{0.44\cdot2}=67.81*2.411=163.48\\\\f(3)=67.81e^{0.44\cdot3}=67.81*3.743=253.84\\\\f(4)=67.81e^{0.44\cdot4}=67.81*5.812=394.14\\\\

The cost per worker goes in five years from $67.81 at 1997, to $394.14 in 2001. It is an increase of $326.33 (481%).

5 0
3 years ago
Evaluate 2a + 6b for a = 4 and b = 5.<br>12a+60 =<br>2a + 6b=​
galina1969 [7]

Answer:

38 and 108

Step-by-step explanation:

2a + 6b

2 (4) + 6 (5) Plug in values

8+30 = 38

12a + 60

12 (4) + 60 = 108

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write the equation in standard form for the circle with radius 11 centered at the origin.
MissTica

Answer:

x^2+y^2=121

Step-by-step explanation:

Since you are at (0,0), you don't need to put K or H for the equation (x-h)^2+(y-k)^2=a^2.

8 0
3 years ago
The test statistic of zequals2.32 is obtained when testing the claim that pgreater than0.3. a. Identify the hypothesis test as b
Sonja [21]

Answer:

a) We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion p is greatr than 0.3, so then the system of hypothesis are.:  

Null hypothesis:p \leq 0.3  

Alternative hypothesis:p > 0.3  

Right tailed test

b) p_v =P(z>2.32)=0.0102  

c) So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.1 we have p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 1% of significance the proportion of interest is higher than 0.3

Step-by-step explanation:

Part a: Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion p is greatr than 0.3, so then the system of hypothesis are.:  

Null hypothesis:p \leq 0.3  

Alternative hypothesis:p > 0.3  

Right tailed test

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitc, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

Calculate the statistic  

For this case the statistic is given by z_{calc}= 2.32

Part b: Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:  

p_v =P(z>2.32)=0.0102  

Part c

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.1 we have p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 1% of significance the proportion of interest is higher than 0.3

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Since 2006​, the amount of money spent at restaurants in a certain country has increased at a rate of 4​% each year. In 2006​, a
    5·2 answers
  • Mary is 5 Times as old as Morgan and the sum of their ages is 72.how old is each person
    5·1 answer
  • Solve 3kx + 24 = 9kx for x.<br> A. x= 4/k<br> B. x= -2/k<br> C. x= 2/k<br> D. x= -4/k
    9·1 answer
  • a book store is having a 30% off sale.diary of a wimpy kid books are now $6.30 each. what was the oringal price of the books
    14·2 answers
  • F(x)= -3x+5, find f(-6)
    5·2 answers
  • IM BEGGING PLEASE SOMEONE ANSWER
    14·2 answers
  • P<br><img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=p%202%20-%204p%20-%2012" id="TexFormula1" title="p 2 - 4p - 12" alt="p 2 - 4p - 12" align
    11·2 answers
  • Which parent functions have negative y-values?
    15·1 answer
  • Can someone pls help me
    9·1 answer
  • Suppose someone spent the following amounts over several months, $640, $710, $700 and $685. What would be their average monthly
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!