1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
avanturin [10]
2 years ago
9

What is the difference between the Dutch East Company and the Dutch West Company?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Gnoma [55]2 years ago
3 0

Explanation:

Two Dutch companies controlled much trade for the Netherlands in the seventeenth century. Like modern corporations, trading companies had private investors who received charters from European governments to control trade in particular parts of the world. The companies had power to establish and control local governments in their regions. They waged war as necessary to protect their regions from native inhabitants and from other foreign powers.

Dutch East India Company

The East Indies was the European name for the islands centered on what is now Indonesia, southeast of India. They were the source of much profitable trade for European countries in the colonial period.

Dutch West India Company

In the early seventeenth century, European merchants had to sail around South America or Africa to get to India. Explorers searched for a faster route through North America to the profitable Asian markets. In 1609, English adventurer Henry Hudson (d. 1611) explored the river that bears his name, near present-day New York City, for the Dutch East India Company. Failing to find the desired Northwest Passage, Hudson instead established what would prove to be a lucrative fur trade with Native Americans.

You might be interested in
Consensus building as a way of solving conflict is an important tool for citizens of a democratic society. ​Which statement desc
Rom4ik [11]

Answer:

Both parties search for common ground or areas of mutual agreement in order to solve a conflict.

Explanation:

A consensus is a general agreement that includes the viewpoint of two or more conflicting parties. Consensus-building is crucial for democracy because democracy is built on the foundation that difference should be tolerated, respected, and taken into account to take decisions.

Consensus leads to policies that partially satisfy each faction's views without fully satisfying them. This makes radical elements in a democracy to reject consensus policies because radicals seek to impose their views over others.

Consensus building is therefore, a trait typical of moderate policymakers who seek peaceful resolutions of conflicting views, and who try to find common ground.

8 0
3 years ago
Q No.1 (Single
valentina_108 [34]

Answer: woooo we will call and ask you what they want for your drink please thank you for sharing this message thank love for

Yoooo this guy is vgayehejevr

Explanation:

Yea

5 0
2 years ago
Because Earth’s axis is ____________________, the hemispheres receive different amounts of solar energy at different times.
Citrus2011 [14]
Its a tilt or about 23.5 degrees tilted. The hemispheres receive different amounts of solar energy due to the rotation of earth and the way the earth is titled towards the sun.
8 0
3 years ago
After reading Case Study 1 & 2; summarize your findings on the impact of
Leto [7]
Social might be the answer I’m not sure
5 0
3 years ago
How do French citizens view their king, King Louis XIV
const2013 [10]

Answer:

Louis XVI was neither a bad person nor a particularly “poor king”. He mostly fell prey of the circumstances. During the later part of King Louis XVI, France entered a period of bad weather and food shortages and high prices. Social and economic turmoil resulted and grew. The French people felt their plight was ignored by Louis XVI, the government, the aristocracy, the nation's religious leaders. And the French people were right. Louis XVI appeared to be oblivious to the growing turmoil in France. His government put a tin ear to the problems of the people. The French aristocracy, which defined the French government, was more interested in personal intrigues, personal and political dalliances and byzantine power plays at court.

In hindsight, the French Revolution was easily avoidable had Louis XVI been an intelligent, energetically active, and reformist king who realized France needed repair and reform. But Louis was not a strong and observant man and he was thoroughly insulated and buffered at the French court by ministers and courtiers who did their best to try to gain the king's personal attention while convincing him everything was alright in France.

Unfortunately for French history, Louis XVI was the wrong man for the throne at the wrong time. There were stronger, more capable earlier Louis kings but when another strong one was needed, it didn't happen.

Explanation:

It's true that he failed to thoroughly overhaul France's intricate taxation systems and privileges, but he did carry out substantial reforms notably with the help of Ministers Turgot and Necker.

He also had some insight : if it hadn't been for him and Vergennes, France would have never taken part in the American War of Independence - which might have been a terrible decision from a financial standpoint but nontheless contributed to the “grandeur” that's so important to the French psyche. And, as it's rarely mentioned, he's the one who outlawed torture, which used to be readily resorted to as part of the judicial process.

As a man, Louis XVI was the subject of much ridicule. Paradoxically, his shortcomings would earn him praises nowadays. He was sneered at for an alleged impotence because he didn't have any mistresses or didn't force himself upon his young wife Marie Antoinette. Nowadays, he would be labelled a “nerd" but at the time his hobbies were deemed unbecoming for a man his standing : he was into locksmithery and geography, and enjoyed strolling on the roofs of Versailles.

He didn't fit in the high society as he was a very clumsy dancer, liked to go to bed early and was also very short sighted, making social interractions awkward as he would often fail to identify people properly.

His main shortcoming was his deep religiousness, so much that he had moral qualms about having his own people shot at. It goes without saying that had Louis XIV been on the throne at the time, the Revolution wouldn't have happened.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement about the law making process is accurate
    5·1 answer
  • The ability to sing one's national anthem, such as "the star-spangled banner," without much difficulty would most likely be a re
    7·1 answer
  • You have a friend, Rachel, who cannot remember where she left a check she had received from a relative for her birthday. She rem
    10·1 answer
  • The United States went on the gold standard in 1934.<br><br> True<br> False
    7·2 answers
  • PIN<br><br> MULTIPLE CHUICE QUESTION<br><br> In the "good ol' days," who settled<br><br> disputes?
    6·1 answer
  • Why are so many afican landmarks named after European leaders​
    14·1 answer
  • When the Supreme Court says a law is unconstitutional it means?
    9·1 answer
  • S What are the benefits of following social rules hos an individual and the society ? 3)​
    9·1 answer
  • Name four federal laws that regulate mining activities in the United States
    15·1 answer
  • What is the gateway pacific project/
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!