Answer:
def first_a(n):
lst1 =[x for x in range(1,n+1)if x%6==0 or x%11 ==0]
print(lst1)
Explanation:
Above is a function in python programming language. We have used list comprehension to check numbers that are multiples of 6 or 11 in a range.
When this function is called it will receive an argument (n) of type integer, a range will then be generated from 1 to n+1 since n is inclusive. The modulo operator is used to determine is a value is a multiple of 6 or 11, since their multiples will evaluate to 0
Answer:
Compare the predictions in terms of the predictors that were used, the magnitude of the difference between the two predictions, and the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods.
Our predictions for the two models were very simmilar. A difference of $32.78 (less than 1% of the total price of the car) is statistically insignificant in this case. Our binned model returned a whole number while the full model returned a more “accurate” price, but ultimately it is a wash. Both models had comparable accuracy, but the full regression seemed to be better trained. If we wanted to use the binned model I would suggest creating smaller bin ranges to prevent underfitting the model. However, when considering the the overall accuracy range and the car sale market both models would be
Explanation:
Available options
=A4&&B4
=A4&" "&B4
="A4"&""&"34"
=A4&""&B4
Answer:
=A4&""&B4
Explanation:
In a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, to combine the content of two cells into another cell, a user will have to use the command &
Hence, in this case, given that there is no need to have any character or blank space in between the content of the starging cells, which is just A4 and B4, then we have the following technique
1. Select the cell C2
2. Input the command = or +, then select cell A4
3. Input the command &
4. Then select the cell B4
5. Click enter.
Therefore, the answer should appear as =A4&B4.
But from the available options, there is nothing like that, so we pick =A4&""&B4 because it gives the same outcome.
