1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
garri49 [273]
2 years ago
12

Help with this question pls

Mathematics
1 answer:
mr_godi [17]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

128 customers

Step-by-step explanation:

Brainliest maybe? :)

You might be interested in
What is the perimeter of the triangle?
Dennis_Churaev [7]
Answer:

The perimeter will be 30

Step-by-step explanation:

Perimeter = all side lengths added

Step 1. Determine the length of the triangle

Answer: 5

Step 2. Determine the width of the triangle

Answer: 12

Step 3. Determine the diagonal line across the triangle

Answer + explanation:

For it to figure it out, we must use this method called Pythagorean Theorem

Pythagorean Theorem: a^2 + b^2 = c^2

Where a = 12 b = 5 and c = the diagonal line

12^2 + 5^2 = c^2

144 + 25 = c^2

c^2 = 169

c = 13

The diagonal line measures 13 units

Step 4. Add all of the dimensions we just reviewed

Answer:

Length = 5

Width = 12

Diagonal line = 13

5 + 12 + 13 = perimeter

perimeter = 30

Therefore, the perimeter is 30


5 0
2 years ago
What is the height of the area is 21 the first base is two in the second base is five
Ivanshal [37]
To find<span> the </span>area<span> of a rectangle multiply its height by its width. For a square you only need to </span>find<span> the length of one of the sides (as each side is the same length) and then multiply this by itself to </span>find<span> the </span>area<span>.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
3. In the figure, c || d. What are the measures<br> of 1 and 2
dem82 [27]

Answer:

1: 105 degrees

2: 75 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

2 is a corresponding angle with 75.

1 is supplementary so  x+75 = 180

x=105

5 0
3 years ago
Will improving customer service result in higher stock prices for the companies providing the better service? "When a company’s
Orlov [11]

Question:

Company                           2007 Score          2008 Score

Rite Aid                                73                          76

Expedia                                75                          77

J.C. Penney                          77                          78

a. For Rite Aid, is the increase in the satisfaction score from 2007 to 2008 statistically  significant? Use α= .05. What can you conclude?

b. Can you conclude that the 2008 score for Rite Aid is above the national average of  75.7? Use α= .05.

c. For Expedia, is the increase from 2007 to 2008 statistically significant? Use α= .05.

d. When conducting a hypothesis test with the values given for the standard deviation,

sample size, and α, how large must the increase from 2007 to 2008 be for it to be statistically  significant?

e. Use the result of part (d) to state whether the increase for J.C. Penney from 2007 to  2008 is statistically significant.

Answer:

a. There is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that the increase in satisfaction score for Rite Aid from 2007 to 2008 is statistically significant

b. There is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that the 2008 Rite Aid score, is above the national average of 75.7

c. The statistical evidence support the claim of a significant increase from 2007 to 2008

d. 1.802 and above is significant

e. The increase of J. C. Penney from 2007 is not statistically significant.

Step-by-step explanation:

Here we have

n = 60

σ = 6

μ₁ = 73

μ₂ = 76

We put H₀ : μ₁ ≥ μ₂ and

Hₐ : μ₁ < μ₂

From which we have;

z=\frac{(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2})}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma_{1}^{2} }{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma _{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}} = \frac{(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2})}{\sqrt{\frac{2\sigma_{}^{2} }{n_{}}}}}

Plugging in the values we have

z =  \frac{(73-76)}{\sqrt{\frac{2\times 6^{2} }{60_{}}}}} = -2.7386

The probability, P from z function computation gives;

P(Z < -2.7386) = 0.0031

Where we have P < α, we reject the null hypothesis meaning that there is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that the increase in satisfaction score for Rite Aid from 2007 to 2008 is statistically significant

b. To test here, we have

H₀ : μ ≤ 75.7

Hₐ : μ > 75.7

The test statistic is given as follows;

z=\frac{\bar{x}-\mu }{\frac{\sigma }{\sqrt{n}}} = \frac{76-75.7 }{\frac{6 }{\sqrt{60}}} = 0.3873

Therefore, we have the probability, P given as the value for the function at z = 0.3873 that is we have;

P = P(Z > 0.3873) = P(Z < -0.3873) = 0.3493

Therefore, since P > α which is 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, that is there is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that the 2008 Rite Aid score, is above the national average of 75.7

c. Here we put

Null hypothesis H₀ : μ₁ ≥ μ₂

Alternative hypothesis Hₐ : μ₁ < μ₂

The test statistic is given by the following equation;

z=\frac{(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2})}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma_{1}^{2} }{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma _{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}} = \frac{(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2})}{\sqrt{\frac{2\sigma_{}^{2} }{n_{}}}}}

Plugging in the values we have

z =  \frac{(75-77)}{\sqrt{\frac{2\times 6^{2} }{60_{}}}}} = -1.8257

The probability, P from z function computation gives;

P(Z < -1.8257) = 0.03394

The statistical evidence support the claim of a significant increase

d. For statistical significance at 0.05 significant level, we have z = -1.644854

Therefore, from;

z=\frac{(\bar{x_{1}}-\bar{x_{2}})-(\mu_{1}-\mu _{2} )}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma_{1}^{2} }{n_{1}}-\frac{\sigma _{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}}. we have;

z \times \sqrt{\frac{\sigma_{1}^{2} }{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma _{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}} + (\mu_{1}-\mu _{2} )}{} ={(\bar{x_{1}}-\bar{x_{2}})

Which gives

{(\bar{x_{1}}-\bar{x_{2}}) = z \times \sqrt{\frac{2\sigma_{}^{2} }{n_{}}}} + (\mu_{1}-\mu _{2} )}{}  = -1.644854 \times \sqrt{\frac{2\times 6_{}^{2} }{60_{}}}} + 0 = -1.802

Therefore an increase of 1.802 and above is significant

e. Based on the result of part d. we have for J.C. Penney from 2007 to 2008 an increase of 1  which is less than 1.802 at 5% significant level, is not significant.

5 0
3 years ago
What two numbers multiply to 196 and add to -28?
Goshia [24]

The two numbers that multiply to 196 and add to -28 are: -14 and -14.

-14 * -14 = 196

-14 + -14 = -28

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Copy and complete:<br> __:11= 1/3 :6
    15·1 answer
  • <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D%20" id="TexFormula1" title=" \frac{1}{3} " alt=" \frac{1}{3} " align=
    8·1 answer
  • Is 3/4 equivalent to 8/12
    9·1 answer
  • 120,395 as a prrcent
    15·1 answer
  • HELLPPPP MEEEEEE please!!!!!
    10·1 answer
  • Let f(x)= 3x – 2. What is the value of f-1(37)?​
    10·1 answer
  • Need help please. Need the answer now
    15·2 answers
  • Alana, a talk show host, invited The studio audience to voice their opinions on raising The driving age. Of the 10 audience mem
    7·2 answers
  • What value makes the equation
    15·2 answers
  • Help help help help
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!