There appears to be a positive correlation between the number of hour spent studydng and the score on the test.
When identifying the independent and dependent quantities, we think about what would cause the other to change. The score on the test would not cause the number of hours spent studying to change; rather, the number of hours spent studying would cause the score to change. This means that the number of hours studying would be the independent quantity and the score would be the dependent quantity.
Plotting the graph with the time studying on the x-axis (independent) and the score on the y-axis (dependent) gives you the graph shown. You can see in the image that there seems to be a positive correlation; the data seem to generally be heading upward.
I believe it’s: 8.992254284692088
The answer to this problem is false.
Answer:
(2,1)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
all are 60°
Step-by-step explanation:
The midpoints of the angle bisector and the foot of the median will lie on the midsegment of the triangle. In order for the foot of the altitude to lie on that same midsegment, the altitude must be a median.
If the angle bisector intersects the midpoint of the midsegment, it, too, is a median. The angle bisector will be a median only if the triangle is isosceles with the bisector's angle being the a.pex. The altitude will be a median only if the altitude's vertex is the a.pex of an isosceles triangle. Hence, the triangle must be equilateral, and all angles are 60°.