I am assuming the both cylinders have the same measure of radius. They only differ in height.
Larger Cylinder = 343 ft³
Smaller Cylinder = 125 ft³ ; height = 5 ft.
We can use proportion for this problem; a:b = c:d where ad = bc
5 ft :125 ft³ = x : 343ft³
5 ft * 343 ft³ = 125 ft³ * x
1715 ft⁴ = 125 ft³ * x
1715 ft⁴ ÷ 125 ft³ = x
13.72 ft = x height of the larger cylinder.
Cone S = 768pi cm³
Cone T = 6144pi cm³ ; height = 24 cm
24 cm : 6144 cm³ = x : 768 cm³
24 cm * 768 cm³ = 6144 cm³ * x
18,432 cm⁴ = 6144 cm³ * x
18,432 cm⁴ ÷ 6,144 cm³ = x
3 cm = x height of Cone S.
Answer:
This only has answer 1. these proofs are really long, so hard to fit them all in one answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
: Will be used very often so just remember this equality.
1. Multiply 
When we factor out the terms, we are left with:
We then use the rule above and convert it to
:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
O.5917
Should be ur answer
Lets solve our radical equation
step by step.
Step 1 add 4 to both sides of the equation:


Step 2 square both sides of the equation:



Step 3 expand the binomial in the right hand side:

Step 4 simplify the expression:


Step 5 factor the expression:

Step 6 solve for each factor:
or 
or 
Now we are going to check both solutions in the original equation to prove if they are valid:
For 


The solution
is a valid solution of the rational equation
.
For 



Since -3 is not equal to -5, the solution
is not a valid solution of the rational equation
; therefore,
is an extraneous solution of the equation.
We can conclude that even all the algebraic procedures of Israel are correct, he did not check for extraneous solutions.
An extraneous solution of an equation is the solution that emerges from the algebraic process of solving the equation but is not a valid solution of the equation. Is worth pointing out that extraneous solutions are particularly frequent in rational equation.