Answer:
In the cause of Randy's extreme dissatisfaction about Eric, Eric should approach Randy to pledge his loyalty to Randy and assure him of his unconditional support to build team cohesion.
Explanation:
Eric's pledge of loyalty and support to ensure that team cohesion is a non negotiable factor in the light of building team cohesion and achieving the goals set before the, Randy will be able to overcome his feelings of Eric being a potential threat. But rather an instrument in achieving their goals.
Answer: The child will engage himself in free exploration to the surrounding, and also be happy upon the caregiver's return
Explanation:
According to the theories of John Bowlby (1988), a child is securely-attached if she is confident of her caregiver’s support. The attachment figure serves as a "secure base" from which the child can confidently explore the world.
The securely-attached child explores the room freely when his mother is present. He may be distressed when his mother leaves, and he explores less when she is absent. But he is happy when she returns.
If he cries, he approaches his mother and holds her tightly. He is comforted by being held, and, once comforted, he is soon ready to resume his independent exploration of the world. His mother is responsive to his needs. As a result, he knows he can depend on her when he is under stress (Ainsworth et al 1978)
Secure attachment is also associated with
keeping track of the caregiver during exploration,approaching or touching the caregiver when anxious or distressed;finding comfort in proximity and contact
And, in the long-term, kids with secure attachments seem to have many advantages - emotional, social, medical, and cognitive.
Answer:
availability heuristic
Explanation:
Availability heuristics strategy of decision making allows a human to use a mental shortcut using past experiences and examples that come to mind when trying to evaluate a particular concept, topic, decision, or method. For the case of Sue, she uses her past experiences to make a decision in this case. It is possible that when similar situation of two kids going to the movies at the same time, something bad happened. She uses this experience to judge her present situation.
Discovery statements are used to alter course, this statement is false.
<h3>
What is Discovery? </h3>
In common law jurisdictions, discovery is the pre-trial stage of a lawsuit during which each party can obtain evidence from the other party or parties through the use of discovery tools like interrogatories, requests for the production of documents, requests for admissions, and depositions.
The early equitable pleading process before the English Court of Chancery had a distinctive characteristic that led to the development of discovery: among other requirements, a plaintiff's bill in equity had to plead "positions." These were assertions of evidence that the plaintiff believed to be true in support of his pleading and that the defendant knew about.
The availability of discovery in equity attracted plaintiffs in legal cases even though it did not exist in common law (legal proceedings in the common law courts). They started submitting bills in equity to acquire discovery in support of legal actions. The law to perpetuate the testimony of a possible witness was born as a result of this in the middle of the 15th century.
To learn more about Discovery follow the link.
brainly.com/question/28338261
#SPJ1
I think that the best answer is: <span>b.paleo Indians relied less on hunting big animals and more on fishing and gathering food
let's look at the options: </span><span>
a. paleo Indians went to war with each other on a large scale due to scarce water resources
- This could be true if it was really hot, but this was not the case. Warming did not mean a really hot climate, but less harsh: so actually, there would be more, not less water resources.
b.paleo Indians relied less on hunting big animals and more on fishing and gathering food
- this is possible ! a warmer climate would mean that there would be more possibility to fish or gather food, which would mean that people didn't have to hunt - and they would not want to hunt big animals, as it's dangerous.
c.paleo Indians faced food shortages that resulted in a lower population
-no, a warmer climate would mean more, not less, food
d.paleo Indians lost land to rising sea level's</span>
-no, they still had a lot of land.
