Hello there!
The answer to this question will be answer choice A.
When using the SAS postulate, we need two pairs of sides and the pair of the angles between those two sides to be congruent.
It is given that one pair of sides are congruent, along with a pair of congruent angles.
We want the congruent angle to be between two congruent sides, thus AC must be congruent to EC in order for these triangles to be proven congruent by the SAS postulate.
Hope this helps and have an awesome day! :)
B, 12.6 because on the chart in the “f” column, next to -4.5 is 12.6
A. This is correct. When you transfer n to the other side, that would be the reciprocal power of a.
b. This is incorrect, because this contradicts with choice a.
c. This is correct. When a number is raised to a "1/n" fraction, that is equivalent to the nth root of the number.
d. This is incorrect, because it is not equivalent to the given equation.
<em>Thus, the answers are A and C.</em>
Hi
<u>The area of a triangle is </u>
If we plug in the given values, we get:
Multiply in the numerator:
Divide:
Therefore, the area of the triangle is 35 inches squared.
Answer:
10 percent
Step-by-step explanation:
- Before 1997, people with a minimum FBGL of 140mg/dl were diagnosed as diabetic
- After 1997, people with a minimum FBGL of 126mg/dl were diagnosed as diabetic
- What is the proportion of people who were not considered diabetic before 1997 but are now considered diabetic (after 1997)?
140 - 126 = 14
In percentage, this proportion is = 14/140 × 100
= 10%
Hence, 10% of the people who were not considered diabetic before 1997 are now or will now be considered diabetic.
