Answer: Sal used a debit card and paid a total of $324.80 for the stereo. (I took the test too)
Step-by-step explanation: Multiply $21.30 by 18 months. Then subtract the interest, $58.60, from the product because Sal paid immediately with a card which implies using a debit card. You get $324.80.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
square-based pyramid:
volume V = (⅓)b²h
= (⅓)7²·16
≅ 261.3 ft³
:::::
Can't help with question 3. I haven't learned triangle-based pyramids.
:::::
cone:
volume V = ⅓πr²h
= ⅓π17²·20
= 6052.8 yd³
:::::
can't help with question 7. Never did this kind of pyramid.
Answer:
Rolling case achieves greater height than sliding case
Step-by-step explanation:
For sliding ball:
- When balls slides up the ramp the kinetic energy is converted to gravitational potential energy.
- We have frictionless ramp, hence no loss due to friction.So the entire kinetic energy is converted into potential energy.
- The ball slides it only has translational kinetic energy as follows:
ΔK.E = ΔP.E
0.5*m*v^2 = m*g*h
h = 0.5v^2 / g
For rolling ball:
- Its the same as the previous case but only difference is that there are two forms of kinetic energy translational and rotational. Thus the energy balance is:
ΔK.E = ΔP.E
0.5*m*v^2 + 0.5*I*w^2 = m*g*h
- Where I: moment of inertia of spherical ball = 2/5 *m*r^2
w: Angular speed = v / r
0.5*m*v^2 + 0.2*m*v^2 = m*g*h
0.7v^2 = g*h
h = 0.7v^2 / g
- From both results we see that 0.7v^2/g for rolling case is greater than 0.5v^2/g sliding case.
Answers
1. 1/4 x M-6= (m+9)x2
Ps. Couldn’t do 4
