All categories

3 years ago

Which three lengths could be the lengths of the sides of a triangle?

Mathematics

1 answer:

natali 33 [55]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

D. 15 cm, 9 cm, 24 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

The three lengths that could be the lengths of the sides of a triangle, must satisfy the following condition;

---sum of any two smaller sides chosen must be equal to the third side.

Test option A : 6 cm + 11 cm = 17 cm ( 17 cm ≠ 23 cm)

Test option B: 10 cm + 15 cm = 25 cm (25 cm ≠ 24 cm)

Test option C: 6 cm + 6 cm = 12 cm (12 cm ≠ 22 cm)

Test option D: 15 cm + 9 cm = 24 cm (24 cm = 24 cm) ---correct option.

Thus, the three lengths that could be the lengths of the sides of a triangle are 15 cm, 9 cm, and 24 cm

You might be interested in

What percent of 33 is 34

Viktor [21]

11.22 is 33% of 34 if that is what youre asking

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The lengths of two sides of a right triangle are given. Find the length of the third side. Round to the nearest tenth if necessa

SVEN [57.7K]

Would be around 24.759

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Plz help I need answer asap

Dimas [21]

Gchdbncxthysshj teethed how

4 0

2 years ago

From the day it starts to grow from a seedling 2 inches high, a magic tree grows 5 inches a day. how tall will it be after 3 wee

Oduvanchick [21]

Your answer is 107 because there are 7 days in a week and there are three weeks so that is 105 inches then add the starting growth of two inches

6 0

3 years ago

The following data lists the ages of a random selection of actresses when they won an award in the category of Best Actress, al

Valentin [98]

Answer:

a) $p_v =P(t_{(9)}$

The p value is higher than the significance level given 0.01, so then we can conclude that we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis. And we can say that the true difference for Best Actresses is not significantly lower than the mean for Best Actors at 1% of significance.

b) The 99% confidence interval would be given by (-21.469;2.069)

c) We got the same conclusion as part a, sicne the confidence interval contains the value 0, we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis that the difference between the two

Step-by-step explanation:

Part a

Let put some notation

x=actor's age , y = actress's age

x: 58 41 36 36 34 33 48 37 37 43

y: 26 27 34 26 35 29 23 42 30 34

The system of hypothesis for this case are:

Null hypothesis: $\mu_y- \mu_x \geq 0$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu_y -\mu_x$

The first step is calculate the difference $d_i=y_i-x_i$ and we obtain this:

d: -32, -14, -2, -10, 1, -4, -25, 5, -7, -9

The second step is calculate the mean difference

$\bar d= \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n d_i}{n}= -9.7$

The third step would be calculate the standard deviation for the differences, and we got:

$s_d =\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n (d_i -\bar d)^2}{n-1} =11.451$

The 4 step is calculate the statistic given by :

$t=\frac{\bar d -0}{\frac{s_d}{\sqrt{n}}}=\frac{-9.7 -0}{\frac{11.451}{\sqrt{10}}}=-2.679$

The next step is calculate the degrees of freedom given by:

$df=n-1=10-1=9$

Now we can calculate the p value, since we have a left tailed test the p value is given by:

$p_v =P(t_{(9)}$

Part b

A confidence interval is "a range of values that’s likely to include a population value with a certain degree of confidence. It is often expressed a % whereby a population means lies between an upper and lower interval".

The margin of error is the range of values below and above the sample statistic in a confidence interval.

Normal distribution, is a "probability distribution that is symmetric about the mean, showing that data near the mean are more frequent in occurrence than data far from the mean".

The confidence interval for the mean is given by the following formula:

$\bar d \pm t_{\alpha/2}\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}$ (1)

Since the Confidence is 0.99 or 99%, the value of $\alpha=0.01$ and $\alpha/2 =0.005$ , and we can use excel, a calculator or a table to find the critical value. The excel command would be: "=-T.INV(0.005,9)".And we see that $t_{\alpha/2}=3.25$

Now we have everything in order to replace into formula (1):

$-9.7-3.25\frac{11.451}{\sqrt{10}}=-21.469$

$-9.7+3.25\frac{11.451}{\sqrt{10}}=2.069$

So on this case the 99% confidence interval would be given by (-21.469;2.069)

Part c

We got the same conclusion as part a, sicne the confidence interval contains the value 0, we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis that the difference between the two means is 0.

8 0

3 years ago