Answer:
The cost of the 28 units sold is $548
Explanation:
In the given question,
On March 1 it purchase 12 units for $15 = 12 units × $15 = $180
On March 2 it purchase 12 units for $24 = 12 units × $24 = $288
On March 6 it purchase 7 units for $20 = 7 units × $20 = $140
And, on march it sold 28 units for $63 each
The 28 units could be taken from
12 × $15 = $180
12 × $24 = $288
And remaining 4 units × $20 = $80
So, the total cost of units sold = $180 +$288 +$80 = $548
<span>Three people share the profit and losses as follows.Total ratio is 100. Hendrick and Mitch each get 2/5 of the profit or suffer 2/5 of the loss i. e (40/100) as well while redding gets 1/5 i. e (20/100). Redding can contribute no more than one-fifth of the liqudated capital. The$20, 000 in excess liability will be distributed in proportion to their ratios. 2/5 * 20, 000 = $8, 000 each for Hendrick and Mitcherum while redding gets 1/5 * 20, 000 = $4000. If the non cash assest is sold Hendrick would receive 2/5 * 50, 000 = 100000/5 = $20, 000. The minmum hendrick would receive would be $20, 000 + $8, 000 = $28, 000</span>
high prices of goods and the change of currency
Explanation:
the the government loses a huge amount of money the currency demands a high exchanging rate
Answer: Indeterminate; Increases
Explanation:
We know that sensors are used as an input in the production of digital cameras. So, if the price of sensors falls, as a result cost of production of digital cameras also falls. This will increase the supply of cameras and shift the supply curve rightwards.
At the same time successful ad campaign will make the digital cameras more fashionable and increases the demand for digital cameras. This will also shift the demand curve rightwards.
Hence, there is an increase in the equilibrium quantity but effect on equilibrium price is indeterminate because it will be depend upon the magnitude of the shift of demand and supply curve.
