Answer:
irst supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1]
Explanation:
The United States involvement in the Mexican Revolution was varied and seemingly contradictory, first supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1] For both economic and political reasons, the U.S. government generally supported those who occupied the seats of power, whether they held that power legitimately or not. A clear exception was the French Intervention in Mexico, when the U.S. supported the beleaguered liberal government of Benito Juárez at the time of the American Civil War (1861-1865). Prior to Woodrow Wilson's inauguration on March 4, 1913, the U.S. Government focused on just warning the Mexican military that decisive action from the U.S. military would take place if lives and property of U.S. nationals living in the country were endangered.[2] President William Howard Taft sent more troops to the US-Mexico border but did not allow them to intervene in the conflict,[3][4] a move which Congress opposed.[4] Twice during the Revolution, the U.S. sent troops into Mexico.
The name of the king of the Hittites as described in the Preamble is Suppiluliumas I.
<h3>Which was the Hittites King name?</h3>
Suppiluliumas I, can be decribed as one which is been known to the Hittite king around c. 1380 and was able to dominate the history of the ancient Middle East.
It should be noted that hew dominated for the greater part of four decades a as regards the Hittite kingdom to Imperial power.
Learn more about Hittites at:
brainly.com/question/16717125
#SPJ1
Answer:a. He was said to perform miracles
Explanation:
