Answer:
D
Explanation:
announcing the product takes place in the commercialization and launch of the product
Answer:
Explicit costs - $51,000
Explicit costs are those for which a person incurs in actual spending of money. In this case, Christine had to pay $15,000 in wages, and $36,000 in rent ($3,000 x 12). These are expenses that she had to pay money for, and that had to be accounted for in the accounting books, and in the financial statements. These are in other words, explicit costs.
Implicit costs - $40,000
Implicit costs are simply the opportunity costs. An opportunity cost is the cost of the next more valuable alternative when faced with two or more options. No money is paid for this costs. The implicit costs for Christine were the $40,000 that she not receive as wages if she had continued working at a real state firm.
Answer:
[(Accounts receivable at the beginning of the year + $138,000) - $144,000] - cash realizable value at the beginning of the year
Explanation: The question is incomplete but just apply the missing figures: [(Accounts receivable at the beginning of the year + Sales on account - Collections on account - write off) - bad debt] - cash realizable value at the beginning of the year
[(Accounts receivable at the beginning of the year + $390,000 - $230,000 - $22,000) - $144,000] - cash realizable value at the beginning of the year
Answer:
1. WCG agrees with its cell plan competitors to raise prices for all customers - Sherman Antitrust Act
2. WCG colludes with another company to stop offering family plan discounts - Sherman Antitrust Act
3. WCG decides to advertise a new plan that is 75 percent off the regular plan, even though it is only 20 percent less - Wheeler-Lea Act
4. WCG promises retail consumers a "wholesale" rate, even though it is the same price as always - Wheeler-Lea Act
5. WCG wants to attract more women to its plans and starts offering female consumers 30 percent off their bill - Robinson-Patman Act
6. WCG offers a discount to teenage males in an effort to get customers from its more trendy competitor - Robinson-Patman Act