Based on economic theory, scarcity is limitation of a resource which cannot be replenished. Shortage is used to indicate a market condition.
When applying this definition to your question, A is your answer.
Answer: $35,000
Explanation:
A casualty loss is simply a loss that an individual or business incurs when a property is damaged, or destroyed due to an unexpected or sudden event like fire, volcanic eruption, flood etc.
Here, Steve's casualty loss will be gotten when we compare both his adjusted basis and the fair market value and then we choose the lesser one. Since $35000 is lesser than $50000, therefore the answer will be $35000.
The principle that's illustrated by the gas tax is known as the benefit received principle.
<h3>What's a tax?</h3>
It should be noted that a tax is a compulsory payment that generate revenue to the government.
In this case, a gas tax imposed by some states in which those who use the roads more pay more to maintain them is based on the benefits received principle.
Learn more about tax on:
brainly.com/question/25783927
Answer:
cause no changes in the demand and supply curves of oil in the current year.
Explanation:
Changes in price don't generate shifts in the supply and demand curves in the short term. It generates a movement along the curves as non price changes are the ones that generate a shift in these curves. If the price of the oil increases, the demand quantity falls which will cause a movement along the demand curve. Also, this situation will increase the supply quantity which also generates a movement along the supply curve.
Question Completion:
Options:
a. There must be at least two parties.
b. Each party is free to accept or reject the exchange offer.
c. Each party believes it is appropriate or desirable to deal with the other party.
d. Each party has something that might be of value to the other party.
Answer:
c. Each party believes it is appropriate or desirable to deal with the other party.
Explanation:
Criteria C is the criteria that will most directly relate to Deon's cancellation of the sponsorships. Business deals and relationships cannot be established or allowed to subsist when it becomes inappropriate or undesirable to deal with the other party because of controversial activities. This is more so when the activities involve political and social justice beliefs and differences. Ordinarily, business partners should not allow such personal prejudices to becloud their relationships. The best approach, therefore, is for business partners to keep their political and social justice beliefs personal and not make them public issues.