<em>So</em><em>,</em>
<em>m</em><em><</em><em>1</em><em>=</em><em>4</em><em>5</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>m</em><em><</em><em>2</em><em>=</em><em>1</em><em>3</em><em>5</em>
<em>So</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>he</em><em> </em><em>right</em><em> </em><em>answer</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>option</em><em> </em><em>D</em><em>.</em>
<em>Look</em><em> </em><em>at</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>attached</em><em> </em><em>picture</em>
<em>H</em><em>ope</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>will</em><em> </em><em>help</em><em> </em><em>you</em>
<em>Good</em><em> </em><em>luck</em><em> </em><em>on</em><em> </em><em>your</em><em> </em><em>assignment</em>
All you need to do is divide 291 by 7. If the quotient is a whole number, then 7 would be a factor of 291.
Let's test it out then, look at the picture attached.
As you can see in the picture attached, there is a remainder, so this would mean that 7 is not a factor of 291.
Answer:
The figures are not similar. If the purple rectangle were to get a transformation, then it would grow. For it to be
Step-by-step explanation:
If the purple rectangle were to get a transformation, then it would grow. For it to be similar it would be stretched one way to be as long as the green rectangle, but that's not how this works. Therefore, they are not similar.
Hope this helps <3
You could do this with a simple proportion.
24/2.94 = 58/x
x = 2.94 * 58/24
x = 7.11
378. Comparing the each batch, there is a difference of 18 for each batch. So 7*18= 126, then add that to 252; you'll get 378.
(ex 198-180=18; 216-198=18; etc)
hope that helps
