Answer:
B- equity and collaboration
Explanation:
Some important framers were George Washington, Janes Madison, and Benjamin Franklin. These people are called framers because they were the ones who wrote and organized the constitution of the United States. They were delegates to the Constitutional Convention and they are also known as the “Founding Fathers”.
The complete question is;
Shield laws protect journalists' right to refuse to testify against their sources while gathering information in their role as journalists. There is no shield law at the federal level.
Which of the following statements is best supported by the information on the map?
A-Some states are more interested in cooperating with the federal government than others are.
B-Some states prioritize freedom of the press over criminal prosecutions.
C-Some states receive more federal funding for shield law programs than other states do.
D-Some states adhere to the exclusionary rule of the First Amendment more than other states do.
Answer:
B). Some states prioritize freedom of the press over criminal prosecutions.
Explanation:
The second statement most adequately backs the information provided on the map that 'certain states give more importance and priority to the press' freedom than to the criminal proceedings.' <u>The description regarding the shield laws proffering the Journalists' with an authority to not reveal the sources they have used to gather specific information displays the significance of media's freedom but it also signals that sometimes this right overpowers the criminal proceedings by hiding the sources that may reveal the truth by providing important evidence or clue to identify the gulity</u>. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
6
Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
C, because smaller states wanted equal representation despite their population.
I gotchu bro
