Answer:
b. outcome fairness
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it seems that Kayla is likely to contend there is a lack of outcome fairness. This term refers to the degree to which an outcome meets the standards that are met. Which is why Kayla is dissatisfied, since the salary increase should always be the same and follow a standard, which is not the case in this scenario since Bob's increase was 3% more.
China should seek assistance from the IMF or International Monetary Fund. According to the IMF, it works to nurture global growth and economic steadiness by providing policy, information and financing the members, by working with developing states to help them reach macroeconomic stability and decrease poverty. The basis for this is that private international capital markets function poorly and many countries have inadequate access to financial markets. Such market imperfections, together with balance-of-payments financing, offer the reasoning for official financing, without which many countries could solitary correct large external payment imbalances through actions with adverse economic consequences. Also, the IMF provides alternate sources of financing.
Answer:
A. Karen understans and appreciates religious beliefs of other cultures
Explanation:
Religious belief is part of the cultural elements.
Comprehending and valuing the religious beliefs of other cultures will enable one work effectively with such diverse group of cultures
Answer: c. 78,000 equivalent units.
Explanation:
Equivalent units for conversion is calculated as:
= Units completed and transferred out + Equivalent ending work in process
Units completed and transferred out:
= Units started into production - Ending units
= 90,000 - 20,000
= 70,000 units
Equivalent ending work in process = 40% * 20,000 work in process units
= 8,000 units
Equivalent units for conversion = 70,000 + 8,000
= 78,000 units
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": willing to pay money (reduce their income) to enforce their own sense of fairness.
Explanation:
The "ultimatum game" is an economic strategy in which two individuals are gathered knowing they will see each other only once. The first individual is in charge of proposing an offer on diving an amount of money. If the second individual rejects the offer neither one of them gets anything. If the second individual accepts the offer, the first individual obtains what was demanded and the rest goes for the second individual.
Thus, <em>the "ultimatum game" shows how someone (the second individual) could turn down a unique offer that does not meet his or her demands. This, with plain knowledge the offer another individual could provide, might be worse, thus, reducing the chances to obtain what is desired for defending his or her sense of fairness.</em>
