<span>how would the market for smartphones be affected if the government charged an excise tax of $5.00 on each smartphone sold ?
C) The supply of smartphones would decrease.
Excise taxes are based on the quantity of an item and not on its value. For example, the federal government imposes an excise tax of 18.4 cents on every gallon of gas purchased, regardless of the price charged by the seller. States often add an additional excise tax on each gallon of fuel.
so, government will charged 5.00$ excise tax on smartphone will affected supply of smartphones would decrease.</span>
The aggregate<span> demand curve, like most typical demand curves, slopes downward from left to right. Demand increases or decreases along the curve as prices for goods and services either increase or decrease. In addition, the curve can </span>shift<span> due to </span>changes<span> in the money </span>supply<span>, or increases and decreases in tax rates.</span>
Answer:
a. 480
Explanation:
The computation of the economic order quantity is given below:
= 480 units
The carrying cost could be determined below:
= $4 × 25%
= $1
hence, the carrying cost is $1
Therefore the economic order quantity is 480
Thus, the correct option is a.
Answer:
The answer is: A) Declare the law constitutional because Milton's actions substantially affect interstate commerce.
Explanation:
The Commerce Clause, Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the Constitution of the United States:
[The Congress shall have Power] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.
Congress can enact laws that regulate interstate commerce, and this law is an example of one of them. It doesn't matter if Milton's action only affect commerce in a very small way, the law is still constitutional.
Answer:
The dean has violated the brights of other members to be picked for the violation through this act of favoritism.
Explanation:
This dean has gone ahead to rewrite David's description. By so doing he has altered the job description to favor david. This shows a bias to David in the side of this dean thereby causing him to violate the act that says that there should be no discrimination or bias of my form.
Rewriting the job description to favor david is against the ethics of the distributive justice framework which says that the distribution of goods in a society must be done In an equitable manner for all. 2 principles of this are applicable here. The rights based justice and also the legal justice. Rights based justice demands that the rights of people bare respected which the dean has clearly also violated.
