Faded feedback uses a high frequency of feedback early in practice and then gradually reduces feedback as the learner's skill begins to develop.
Faded feedback involves initial high-level assistance that gradually decreases as trainees advance through the training programme. However, as stated by Goodman and Wood (2009), faded feedback has very little empirical validity.
Their findings imply that trainees' "stuck in their ways" behavior was caused by faded feedback. In other words, trainees tend to continue performing in ways consistent with the feedback throughout the training course when they receive high levels of feedback early on.
Despite the intuitive attraction of faded feedback, Goodman and Wood's findings imply that this feedback strategy did not result in greater learning or increased training transfer when compared to the alternative.
Learn more about feedback here
brainly.com/question/26994432
#SPJ4
It is specifically focused on an argument which defines your goal and the scope of the thesis. Its main purpose is to support and prove your main argument. It's like a person arguing to prove his position which means he is making a claim. If written effectively, a claim statement will keep your readers interested.
Answer:
Congress was concerned about how admitting it as a slave state would affect representation and the balance of power between states.
Explanation:
During that period, Missouri was a huge area that was called Missouri Territory and by 1819, there were enough people in part of that so it could be considered a state. But to be considered a state the Congress had to approve it.
In that period there was a struggle between free states and pro-slavery states the union wanted a balance between those two and the addition of a new state could ruin that balance.
The admission of Missouri would have added a slave state to the Senate and left northern non-slave states as a minority. This is the reason the application of Missouri caused a two-year debate.
Answer:
Philosophers and scientists don't have a moral obligation to work together; they should do so because it makes their respective work more interesting to pursue.
Explanation:
In the holistic kinesiology approach outlined in the text, philosophers and scientists have a moral obligation to work together so that works would have a purpose.
Therefore, the correct answer is option C.
