If it is 5+2x=2x+6 than the answer is no solution
We have to simplify and get the value of x from this inequality given:
Given inequality,

Now let's simplify by using distributive property,

We need to find x, so let's isolate x to the letter side of the inequality for calculation at ease.


Now, dividing -2 from both sides.
Note : As we are dividing a negative number from both sides, the sign of the inequality will be <u>reversed</u>.


Now subtracting -7 from both sides,


Or, Interval of the equal ![(- \infin, -7 ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%28-%20%5Cinfin%2C%20-7%20%5D)
#CarryOnLearning
<u>━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━</u>
Answer:
16Km due east of school P
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
A school P is 16km due west of a school Q
Thus, we can say that distance PQ = 16 km.
________________________________
now we have to find the bearing of Q from P
As distance is same
distance PQ = distance QP
Thus,
Distance will remain same of 16 km.
For direction,
If Q is west of P, then P will be east of Q
as shown in figure P is west of Q,
now from point P , Q is west P.
Thus,
Bearing of School Q from P is 16Km due east of school P
Answer:
C) fails to consider that commuting trips may cause significantly more than 20 percent of the traffic congestion
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct option is - C) fails to consider that commuting trips may cause significantly more than 20 percent of the traffic congestion
Reason -
Option A is incorrect because the statistics can not be incorrect.
Option B is incorrect because they are not talking about the city.
Option C is correct because Urban rail reduces congestion.
Option D is incorrect because the opposers cited the example of one city and the supporters are presenting evidence in the case of that city itself.
Option E is incorrect because they are providing an explanation for why the commuters data given by opposers is not relevant. The opposers talked about commuters.